On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 01:58:30AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wednesday, March 22, 2017 09:01:48 AM Lee, Chun-Yi wrote:
> > Just checking the state of container is not enough to confirm that
> > the whole container is offlined.
>
> And why is that so?
>
Actually there does not have
On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 01:58:30AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wednesday, March 22, 2017 09:01:48 AM Lee, Chun-Yi wrote:
> > Just checking the state of container is not enough to confirm that
> > the whole container is offlined.
>
> And why is that so?
>
Actually there does not have
On Wednesday, March 22, 2017 09:01:48 AM Lee, Chun-Yi wrote:
> Just checking the state of container is not enough to confirm that
> the whole container is offlined.
And why is that so?
> Kernel should checks all children's
> offline state as the logic in acpi_container_offline().
>
> Cc:
On Wednesday, March 22, 2017 09:01:48 AM Lee, Chun-Yi wrote:
> Just checking the state of container is not enough to confirm that
> the whole container is offlined.
And why is that so?
> Kernel should checks all children's
> offline state as the logic in acpi_container_offline().
>
> Cc:
Just checking the state of container is not enough to confirm that
the whole container is offlined. Kernel should checks all children's
offline state as the logic in acpi_container_offline().
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki"
Cc: Len Brown
Cc: Michal Hocko
Just checking the state of container is not enough to confirm that
the whole container is offlined. Kernel should checks all children's
offline state as the logic in acpi_container_offline().
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki"
Cc: Len Brown
Cc: Michal Hocko
Cc: Jiri Kosina
Signed-off-by: "Lee, Chun-Yi"
6 matches
Mail list logo