On Monday, July 20, 2015 01:14:41 PM Pan Xinhui wrote:
> hi, Rafael
> thanks for your reply :)
> On 2015年07月18日 08:34, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Tuesday, July 14, 2015 10:52:35 AM Pan Xinhui wrote:
> >> hi, Rafael,
> >>let me do more explanation :)
> >>
> >> On 2015年07月14日 10:09,
On Monday, July 20, 2015 01:14:41 PM Pan Xinhui wrote:
hi, Rafael
thanks for your reply :)
On 2015年07月18日 08:34, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Tuesday, July 14, 2015 10:52:35 AM Pan Xinhui wrote:
hi, Rafael,
let me do more explanation :)
On 2015年07月14日 10:09, Pan Xinhui wrote:
hi, Rafael
thanks for your reply :)
On 2015年07月18日 08:34, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday, July 14, 2015 10:52:35 AM Pan Xinhui wrote:
>> hi, Rafael,
>> let me do more explanation :)
>>
>> On 2015年07月14日 10:09, Pan Xinhui wrote:
>>> hi, Rafael,
>>> thanks for you reply :)
hi, Rafael
thanks for your reply :)
On 2015年07月18日 08:34, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Tuesday, July 14, 2015 10:52:35 AM Pan Xinhui wrote:
hi, Rafael,
let me do more explanation :)
On 2015年07月14日 10:09, Pan Xinhui wrote:
hi, Rafael,
thanks for you reply :)
On 2015年07月14日
On Tuesday, July 14, 2015 10:52:35 AM Pan Xinhui wrote:
> hi, Rafael,
> let me do more explanation :)
>
> On 2015年07月14日 10:09, Pan Xinhui wrote:
> > hi, Rafael,
> > thanks for you reply :)
> > On 2015年07月14日 07:26, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >> On Monday, July 13, 2015 02:33:08 PM Pan
On Tuesday, July 14, 2015 10:52:35 AM Pan Xinhui wrote:
hi, Rafael,
let me do more explanation :)
On 2015年07月14日 10:09, Pan Xinhui wrote:
hi, Rafael,
thanks for you reply :)
On 2015年07月14日 07:26, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Monday, July 13, 2015 02:33:08 PM Pan Xinhui wrote:
hi, Rafael,
let me do more explanation :)
On 2015年07月14日 10:09, Pan Xinhui wrote:
> hi, Rafael,
> thanks for you reply :)
> On 2015年07月14日 07:26, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> On Monday, July 13, 2015 02:33:08 PM Pan Xinhui wrote:
>>> hi, Rafeal
>>> thanks for your reply. :)
>>>
hi, Rafael,
thanks for you reply :)
On 2015年07月14日 07:26, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Monday, July 13, 2015 02:33:08 PM Pan Xinhui wrote:
>> hi, Rafeal
>> thanks for your reply. :)
>>
>> On 2015年07月11日 04:44, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 7:50 AM,
On Monday, July 13, 2015 02:33:08 PM Pan Xinhui wrote:
> hi, Rafeal
> thanks for your reply. :)
>
> On 2015年07月11日 04:44, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 7:50 AM, Pan Xinhui wrote:
> >>
> >> If CONFIG_X86_ACPI_CPUFREQ_CPB has not been defined, the
hi, Rafeal
thanks for your reply. :)
On 2015年07月11日 04:44, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 7:50 AM, Pan Xinhui wrote:
>>
>> If CONFIG_X86_ACPI_CPUFREQ_CPB has not been defined, the placeholder for
>> cpb is not needed. Add ifdef around it.
>>
>> Signed-off-by:
hi, Rafael,
let me do more explanation :)
On 2015年07月14日 10:09, Pan Xinhui wrote:
hi, Rafael,
thanks for you reply :)
On 2015年07月14日 07:26, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Monday, July 13, 2015 02:33:08 PM Pan Xinhui wrote:
hi, Rafeal
thanks for your reply. :)
On 2015年07月11日
hi, Rafael,
thanks for you reply :)
On 2015年07月14日 07:26, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Monday, July 13, 2015 02:33:08 PM Pan Xinhui wrote:
hi, Rafeal
thanks for your reply. :)
On 2015年07月11日 04:44, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 7:50 AM, Pan Xinhui
On Monday, July 13, 2015 02:33:08 PM Pan Xinhui wrote:
hi, Rafeal
thanks for your reply. :)
On 2015年07月11日 04:44, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 7:50 AM, Pan Xinhui xinhuix@intel.com wrote:
If CONFIG_X86_ACPI_CPUFREQ_CPB has not been defined, the
hi, Rafeal
thanks for your reply. :)
On 2015年07月11日 04:44, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 7:50 AM, Pan Xinhui xinhuix@intel.com wrote:
If CONFIG_X86_ACPI_CPUFREQ_CPB has not been defined, the placeholder for
cpb is not needed. Add ifdef around it.
Hi,
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 7:50 AM, Pan Xinhui wrote:
>
> If CONFIG_X86_ACPI_CPUFREQ_CPB has not been defined, the placeholder for
> cpb is not needed. Add ifdef around it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pan Xinhui
> ---
> drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff
Hi,
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 7:50 AM, Pan Xinhui xinhuix@intel.com wrote:
If CONFIG_X86_ACPI_CPUFREQ_CPB has not been defined, the placeholder for
cpb is not needed. Add ifdef around it.
Signed-off-by: Pan Xinhui xinhuix@intel.com
---
drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c | 2 ++
1 file
If CONFIG_X86_ACPI_CPUFREQ_CPB has not been defined, the placeholder for
cpb is not needed. Add ifdef around it.
Signed-off-by: Pan Xinhui
---
drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
If CONFIG_X86_ACPI_CPUFREQ_CPB has not been defined, the placeholder for
cpb is not needed. Add ifdef around it.
Signed-off-by: Pan Xinhui xinhuix@intel.com
---
drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
18 matches
Mail list logo