Re: [PATCH] arm64: Fix SCTLR_EL1 initialisation

2014-12-30 Thread Suzuki K. Poulose
On 17/12/14 17:39, Will Deacon wrote: On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 03:50:21PM +, Suzuki K. Poulose wrote: From: "Suzuki K. Poulose" We initialise the SCTLR_EL1 value by read-modify-writeback of the desired bits, leaving the other bits (including reserved bits(RESx)) untouched. However,

Re: [PATCH] arm64: Fix SCTLR_EL1 initialisation

2014-12-30 Thread Suzuki K. Poulose
On 17/12/14 17:39, Will Deacon wrote: On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 03:50:21PM +, Suzuki K. Poulose wrote: From: Suzuki K. Poulose suzuki.poul...@arm.com We initialise the SCTLR_EL1 value by read-modify-writeback of the desired bits, leaving the other bits (including reserved bits(RESx))

Re: [PATCH] arm64: Fix SCTLR_EL1 initialisation

2014-12-23 Thread Catalin Marinas
On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 05:39:16PM +, Will Deacon wrote: > On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 03:50:21PM +, Suzuki K. Poulose wrote: > > From: "Suzuki K. Poulose" > > > > We initialise the SCTLR_EL1 value by read-modify-writeback > > of the desired bits, leaving the other bits (including reserved >

Re: [PATCH] arm64: Fix SCTLR_EL1 initialisation

2014-12-23 Thread Catalin Marinas
On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 05:39:16PM +, Will Deacon wrote: On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 03:50:21PM +, Suzuki K. Poulose wrote: From: Suzuki K. Poulose suzuki.poul...@arm.com We initialise the SCTLR_EL1 value by read-modify-writeback of the desired bits, leaving the other bits (including

Re: [PATCH] arm64: Fix SCTLR_EL1 initialisation

2014-12-17 Thread Will Deacon
On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 03:50:21PM +, Suzuki K. Poulose wrote: > From: "Suzuki K. Poulose" > > We initialise the SCTLR_EL1 value by read-modify-writeback > of the desired bits, leaving the other bits (including reserved > bits(RESx)) untouched. However, sometimes the boot monitor could >

[PATCH] arm64: Fix SCTLR_EL1 initialisation

2014-12-17 Thread Suzuki K. Poulose
From: "Suzuki K. Poulose" We initialise the SCTLR_EL1 value by read-modify-writeback of the desired bits, leaving the other bits (including reserved bits(RESx)) untouched. However, sometimes the boot monitor could leave garbage values in the RESx bits which could have different implications.

[PATCH] arm64: Fix SCTLR_EL1 initialisation

2014-12-17 Thread Suzuki K. Poulose
From: Suzuki K. Poulose suzuki.poul...@arm.com We initialise the SCTLR_EL1 value by read-modify-writeback of the desired bits, leaving the other bits (including reserved bits(RESx)) untouched. However, sometimes the boot monitor could leave garbage values in the RESx bits which could have

Re: [PATCH] arm64: Fix SCTLR_EL1 initialisation

2014-12-17 Thread Will Deacon
On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 03:50:21PM +, Suzuki K. Poulose wrote: From: Suzuki K. Poulose suzuki.poul...@arm.com We initialise the SCTLR_EL1 value by read-modify-writeback of the desired bits, leaving the other bits (including reserved bits(RESx)) untouched. However, sometimes the boot