Re: [PATCH] bonding: Inactive slaves should keep inactive flag's value to 1 in tlb and alb mode.

Hi! Reading the subject line... I wonder if it violates Oracle's anti-sexual-harrasment policy. As if daemons and killing children recursively was not enough, we are now bonding inactive slaves :-). SCNR, Pavel -- (english)

Re: [PATCH] bonding: Inactive slaves should keep inactive flag's value to 1 in tlb and alb mode.

Hi! Reading the subject line... I wonder if it violates Oracle's anti-sexual-harrasment policy. As if daemons and killing children recursively was not enough, we are now bonding inactive slaves :-). SCNR, Pavel -- (english)

Re: [PATCH] bonding: Inactive slaves should keep inactive flag's value to 1 in tlb and alb mode.

于 2014年03月28日 01:23, Jay Vosburgh 写道: > Zheng Li wrote: > >> In bond mode tlb and alb, inactive slaves should keep inactive flag to >> 1 to refuse to receive broadcast packets. Now, active slave send broadcast >> packets >> (for example ARP requests) which will arrive inactive slaves on same

Re: [PATCH] bonding: Inactive slaves should keep inactive flag's value to 1 in tlb and alb mode.

于 2014年03月28日 01:23, Jay Vosburgh 写道: Zheng Li zheng.x...@oracle.com wrote: In bond mode tlb and alb, inactive slaves should keep inactive flag to 1 to refuse to receive broadcast packets. Now, active slave send broadcast packets (for example ARP requests) which will arrive inactive slaves

Re: [PATCH] bonding: Inactive slaves should keep inactive flag's value to 1 in tlb and alb mode.

Zheng Li wrote: >In bond mode tlb and alb, inactive slaves should keep inactive flag to >1 to refuse to receive broadcast packets. Now, active slave send broadcast >packets >(for example ARP requests) which will arrive inactive slaves on same host from >switch, >but inactive slave's inactive

Re: [PATCH] bonding: Inactive slaves should keep inactive flag's value to 1 in tlb and alb mode.

Zheng Li zheng.x...@oracle.com wrote: In bond mode tlb and alb, inactive slaves should keep inactive flag to 1 to refuse to receive broadcast packets. Now, active slave send broadcast packets (for example ARP requests) which will arrive inactive slaves on same host from switch, but inactive

Re: [PATCH] bonding: Inactive slaves should keep inactive flag's value to 1 in tlb and alb mode.

Hi Jay, What's your opinion about the new patch. Thanks, Zheng Li 于 2014年03月26日 08:53, Ding Tianhong 写道: > On 2014/3/25 16:36, zheng.li wrote: >> 于 2014年03月25日 11:42, Ding Tianhong 写道: >>> On 2014/3/25 11:00, Zheng Li wrote: In bond mode tlb and alb, inactive slaves should keep inactive

Re: [PATCH] bonding: Inactive slaves should keep inactive flag's value to 1 in tlb and alb mode.

Hi Jay, What's your opinion about the new patch. Thanks, Zheng Li 于 2014年03月26日 08:53, Ding Tianhong 写道: On 2014/3/25 16:36, zheng.li wrote: 于 2014年03月25日 11:42, Ding Tianhong 写道: On 2014/3/25 11:00, Zheng Li wrote: In bond mode tlb and alb, inactive slaves should keep inactive flag to 1 to

Re: [PATCH] bonding: Inactive slaves should keep inactive flag's value to 1 in tlb and alb mode.

On 2014/3/25 16:36, zheng.li wrote: > 于 2014年03月25日 11:42, Ding Tianhong 写道: >> On 2014/3/25 11:00, Zheng Li wrote: >>> In bond mode tlb and alb, inactive slaves should keep inactive flag to >>> 1 to refuse to receive broadcast packets. Now, active slave send broadcast >>> packets >>> (for

Re: [PATCH] bonding: Inactive slaves should keep inactive flag's value to 1 in tlb and alb mode.

于 2014年03月25日 11:42, Ding Tianhong 写道: > On 2014/3/25 11:00, Zheng Li wrote: >> In bond mode tlb and alb, inactive slaves should keep inactive flag to >> 1 to refuse to receive broadcast packets. Now, active slave send broadcast >> packets >> (for example ARP requests) which will arrive inactive

Re: [PATCH] bonding: Inactive slaves should keep inactive flag's value to 1 in tlb and alb mode.

于 2014年03月25日 11:42, Ding Tianhong 写道: On 2014/3/25 11:00, Zheng Li wrote: In bond mode tlb and alb, inactive slaves should keep inactive flag to 1 to refuse to receive broadcast packets. Now, active slave send broadcast packets (for example ARP requests) which will arrive inactive slaves on

Re: [PATCH] bonding: Inactive slaves should keep inactive flag's value to 1 in tlb and alb mode.

On 2014/3/25 16:36, zheng.li wrote: 于 2014年03月25日 11:42, Ding Tianhong 写道: On 2014/3/25 11:00, Zheng Li wrote: In bond mode tlb and alb, inactive slaves should keep inactive flag to 1 to refuse to receive broadcast packets. Now, active slave send broadcast packets (for example ARP requests)

Re: [PATCH] bonding: Inactive slaves should keep inactive flag's value to 1 in tlb and alb mode.

On 2014/3/25 11:00, Zheng Li wrote: > In bond mode tlb and alb, inactive slaves should keep inactive flag to > 1 to refuse to receive broadcast packets. Now, active slave send broadcast > packets > (for example ARP requests) which will arrive inactive slaves on same host > from switch, > but

[PATCH] bonding: Inactive slaves should keep inactive flag's value to 1 in tlb and alb mode.

In bond mode tlb and alb, inactive slaves should keep inactive flag to 1 to refuse to receive broadcast packets. Now, active slave send broadcast packets (for example ARP requests) which will arrive inactive slaves on same host from switch, but inactive slave's inactive flag is zero that cause

[PATCH] bonding: Inactive slaves should keep inactive flag's value to 1 in tlb and alb mode.

In bond mode tlb and alb, inactive slaves should keep inactive flag to 1 to refuse to receive broadcast packets. Now, active slave send broadcast packets (for example ARP requests) which will arrive inactive slaves on same host from switch, but inactive slave's inactive flag is zero that cause

Re: [PATCH] bonding: Inactive slaves should keep inactive flag's value to 1 in tlb and alb mode.

On 2014/3/25 11:00, Zheng Li wrote: In bond mode tlb and alb, inactive slaves should keep inactive flag to 1 to refuse to receive broadcast packets. Now, active slave send broadcast packets (for example ARP requests) which will arrive inactive slaves on same host from switch, but inactive