On Mon, 2008-01-14 at 20:31 +0100, Stefan Richter wrote:
> AFAIU Daniel's patch still leaves the possibility to use the '-'
> syntax,
> doesn't it?
>
> (The program 'cat' is of the kind which always reads from stdin if no
> file name is given, or if '-' is given instead of a file name. So,
>
On 01/14/2008 08:31 PM, Stefan Richter wrote:
it is with cat. There you have to type no less than 'cat --help', or at
least with GNU cat.)
--h (--he --hel --help) suffices due to getopt_long gnu implementation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the
Daniel Walker wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-01-14 at 19:12 +, Andy Whitcroft wrote:
>> with this I cannot run checkpatch and "type" (ie paste) a patch
>> fragment to check it.
...
> I'm not sure I understand what you mean .. Can you give an example?
AFAIU Daniel's patch still leaves the possibility
On Mon, 2008-01-14 at 19:12 +, Andy Whitcroft wrote:
> So it does, however that of itself differs from the unix norm; as with
> this I cannot run checkpatch and "type" (ie paste) a patch fragment to
> check it. So I don't think we want the semantics as you have there,
> as its confusing to
On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 09:35:15AM -0800, Daniel Walker wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2008-01-14 at 17:17 +, Andy Whitcroft wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 06:06:35PM +0100, Stefan Richter wrote:
> > > Signed-off-by: Stefan Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Acked-by: Jiri Slaby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
On Mon, 2008-01-14 at 17:17 +, Andy Whitcroft wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 06:06:35PM +0100, Stefan Richter wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Stefan Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Acked-by: Jiri Slaby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> As an absolute minimum this seems reasonable to me. I guess we could
On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 06:06:35PM +0100, Stefan Richter wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Acked-by: Jiri Slaby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
As an absolute minimum this seems reasonable to me. I guess we could
make no arguments default to '-' also. There are up and downsides
On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 06:06:35PM +0100, Stefan Richter wrote:
Signed-off-by: Stefan Richter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Acked-by: Jiri Slaby [EMAIL PROTECTED]
As an absolute minimum this seems reasonable to me. I guess we could
make no arguments default to '-' also. There are up and downsides to
On Mon, 2008-01-14 at 17:17 +, Andy Whitcroft wrote:
On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 06:06:35PM +0100, Stefan Richter wrote:
Signed-off-by: Stefan Richter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Acked-by: Jiri Slaby [EMAIL PROTECTED]
As an absolute minimum this seems reasonable to me. I guess we could
make no
On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 09:35:15AM -0800, Daniel Walker wrote:
On Mon, 2008-01-14 at 17:17 +, Andy Whitcroft wrote:
On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 06:06:35PM +0100, Stefan Richter wrote:
Signed-off-by: Stefan Richter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Acked-by: Jiri Slaby [EMAIL PROTECTED]
As an
On Mon, 2008-01-14 at 19:12 +, Andy Whitcroft wrote:
So it does, however that of itself differs from the unix norm; as with
this I cannot run checkpatch and type (ie paste) a patch fragment to
check it. So I don't think we want the semantics as you have there,
as its confusing to the
On Mon, 2008-01-14 at 20:31 +0100, Stefan Richter wrote:
AFAIU Daniel's patch still leaves the possibility to use the '-'
syntax,
doesn't it?
(The program 'cat' is of the kind which always reads from stdin if no
file name is given, or if '-' is given instead of a file name. So,
'cat'
Daniel Walker wrote:
On Mon, 2008-01-14 at 19:12 +, Andy Whitcroft wrote:
with this I cannot run checkpatch and type (ie paste) a patch
fragment to check it.
...
I'm not sure I understand what you mean .. Can you give an example?
AFAIU Daniel's patch still leaves the possibility to use
On 01/14/2008 08:31 PM, Stefan Richter wrote:
it is with cat. There you have to type no less than 'cat --help', or at
least with GNU cat.)
--h (--he --hel --help) suffices due to getopt_long gnu implementation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the
On Fri, 2008-01-11 at 18:29 +0100, Stefan Richter wrote:
> Daniel Walker wrote:
> > On Fri, 2008-01-11 at 18:06 +0100, Stefan Richter wrote:
> >> Signed-off-by: Stefan Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> + print "When patchfile is -, read standard input.\n";
>
> > Naww .. Why add documentation
Daniel Walker wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-01-11 at 18:06 +0100, Stefan Richter wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Stefan Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> +print "When patchfile is -, read standard input.\n";
> Naww .. Why add documentation when you can just make it do the right
> thing ..
Why add code for a
On Fri, 2008-01-11 at 18:06 +0100, Stefan Richter wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Acked-by: Jiri Slaby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ---
> scripts/checkpatch.pl |1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> Index: linux/scripts/checkpatch.pl
>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Acked-by: Jiri Slaby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
scripts/checkpatch.pl |1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
Index: linux/scripts/checkpatch.pl
===
---
On Fri, 2008-01-11 at 18:06 +0100, Stefan Richter wrote:
Signed-off-by: Stefan Richter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Acked-by: Jiri Slaby [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
scripts/checkpatch.pl |1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
Index: linux/scripts/checkpatch.pl
Daniel Walker wrote:
On Fri, 2008-01-11 at 18:06 +0100, Stefan Richter wrote:
Signed-off-by: Stefan Richter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+print When patchfile is -, read standard input.\n;
Naww .. Why add documentation when you can just make it do the right
thing ..
Why add code for a feature
On Fri, 2008-01-11 at 18:29 +0100, Stefan Richter wrote:
Daniel Walker wrote:
On Fri, 2008-01-11 at 18:06 +0100, Stefan Richter wrote:
Signed-off-by: Stefan Richter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+ print When patchfile is -, read standard input.\n;
Naww .. Why add documentation when you can just
21 matches
Mail list logo
