[PATCH] tidy 53c7,8xx.c was Re: [PATCH] de620.c: nitpicking

2001-01-08 Thread Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
ouch, sorry for the misleading subject, cut and paste sometimes doesn't work ;( Em Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 08:25:33PM -0200, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu: > Hi, > > Please consider applying, no need to restore_flags here, as it is > restored in the beginning of this if block. > > -

Re: [PATCH] de620.c: nitpicking

2001-01-08 Thread Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Hi, Please consider applying, no need to restore_flags here, as it is restored in the beginning of this if block. - Arnaldo --- linux-2.4.0-ac3/drivers/scsi/53c7,8xx.c Fri Oct 13 18:40:51 2000 +++ linux-2.4.0-ac3.acme/drivers/scsi/53c7,8xx.cMon Jan 8 20:24:35 2001 @@

[PATCH] de620.c: nitpicking

2001-01-08 Thread Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Bjorn/Alan, Yes, I'm a nitpicker ;) --- linux-2.4.0-ac3/drivers/net/de620.c Tue Dec 19 11:24:52 2000 +++ linux-2.4.0-ac3.acme/drivers/net/de620.cMon Jan 8 20:06:28 2001 @@ -563,7 +563,6 @@ printk(KERN_WARNING "%s: No tx-buffer available!\n", dev->name);

[PATCH] de620.c: nitpicking

2001-01-08 Thread Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Bjorn/Alan, Yes, I'm a nitpicker ;) --- linux-2.4.0-ac3/drivers/net/de620.c Tue Dec 19 11:24:52 2000 +++ linux-2.4.0-ac3.acme/drivers/net/de620.cMon Jan 8 20:06:28 2001 @@ -563,7 +563,6 @@ printk(KERN_WARNING "%s: No tx-buffer available!\n", dev-name);

Re: [PATCH] de620.c: nitpicking

2001-01-08 Thread Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Hi, Please consider applying, no need to restore_flags here, as it is restored in the beginning of this if block. - Arnaldo --- linux-2.4.0-ac3/drivers/scsi/53c7,8xx.c Fri Oct 13 18:40:51 2000 +++ linux-2.4.0-ac3.acme/drivers/scsi/53c7,8xx.cMon Jan 8 20:24:35 2001 @@

[PATCH] tidy 53c7,8xx.c was Re: [PATCH] de620.c: nitpicking

2001-01-08 Thread Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
ouch, sorry for the misleading subject, cut and paste sometimes doesn't work ;( Em Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 08:25:33PM -0200, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu: Hi, Please consider applying, no need to restore_flags here, as it is restored in the beginning of this if block. - Arnaldo