Vinod Koul writes:
> On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 07:23:33PM -0700, Eric Anholt wrote:
>> The min() macro was complaining about mismatched types. The max len
>> is at most SZ_1G, so we can just put it in an unsigned int.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Eric Anholt
>>
Vinod Koul writes:
> On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 07:23:33PM -0700, Eric Anholt wrote:
>> The min() macro was complaining about mismatched types. The max len
>> is at most SZ_1G, so we can just put it in an unsigned int.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Eric Anholt
>> ---
>>
>> Vinod, if you ack it, this one
On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 07:23:33PM -0700, Eric Anholt wrote:
> The min() macro was complaining about mismatched types. The max len
> is at most SZ_1G, so we can just put it in an unsigned int.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Anholt
> ---
>
> Vinod, if you ack it, this one would be
On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 07:23:33PM -0700, Eric Anholt wrote:
> The min() macro was complaining about mismatched types. The max len
> is at most SZ_1G, so we can just put it in an unsigned int.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Anholt
> ---
>
> Vinod, if you ack it, this one would be nice to be able to
The min() macro was complaining about mismatched types. The max len
is at most SZ_1G, so we can just put it in an unsigned int.
Signed-off-by: Eric Anholt
---
Vinod, if you ack it, this one would be nice to be able to merge
through the -soc tree, so that when we enable of
The min() macro was complaining about mismatched types. The max len
is at most SZ_1G, so we can just put it in an unsigned int.
Signed-off-by: Eric Anholt
---
Vinod, if you ack it, this one would be nice to be able to merge
through the -soc tree, so that when we enable of arm64 builds of this
6 matches
Mail list logo