Re: [PATCH] dma-buf: Rename dma-ops to prevent conflict with kunmap_atomic macro

Minor nits, otherwise the vmwgfx part, Reviewed-by: Sinclair Yeh On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 06:17:00PM -0600, Logan Gunthorpe wrote: > Seeing the kunmap_atomic dma_buf_op shares the same name with a macro s^ > in higmem.h, the former can be

Re: [PATCH] dma-buf: Rename dma-ops to prevent conflict with kunmap_atomic macro

Minor nits, otherwise the vmwgfx part, Reviewed-by: Sinclair Yeh On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 06:17:00PM -0600, Logan Gunthorpe wrote: > Seeing the kunmap_atomic dma_buf_op shares the same name with a macro s^ > in higmem.h, the former can be aliased if any

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] dma-buf: Rename dma-ops to prevent conflict with kunmap_atomic macro

Hi Logan, [auto build test ERROR on linus/master] [also build test ERROR on v4.11-rc7 next-20170418] [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system] url:

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] dma-buf: Rename dma-ops to prevent conflict with kunmap_atomic macro

Hi Logan, [auto build test ERROR on linus/master] [also build test ERROR on v4.11-rc7 next-20170418] [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system] url:

[PATCH] dma-buf: Rename dma-ops to prevent conflict with kunmap_atomic macro

Seeing the kunmap_atomic dma_buf_op shares the same name with a macro in higmem.h, the former can be aliased if any dma-buf user includes that header. I'm personally trying to include highmem.h inside scatterlist.h and this breaks the dma-buf code proper. Christoph Hellwig suggested [1] renaming

[PATCH] dma-buf: Rename dma-ops to prevent conflict with kunmap_atomic macro

Seeing the kunmap_atomic dma_buf_op shares the same name with a macro in higmem.h, the former can be aliased if any dma-buf user includes that header. I'm personally trying to include highmem.h inside scatterlist.h and this breaks the dma-buf code proper. Christoph Hellwig suggested [1] renaming