On Sun, 01 May, at 01:25:12AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Saturday 30 April 2016 23:46:41 Matt Fleming wrote:
> >
> > > It's not something we'd have to worry about in practice, but it does
> > > make my patch incorrect. Should we come up with a different way to
> > > do it?
> >
> > Jeremy
On Sun, 01 May, at 01:25:12AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Saturday 30 April 2016 23:46:41 Matt Fleming wrote:
> >
> > > It's not something we'd have to worry about in practice, but it does
> > > make my patch incorrect. Should we come up with a different way to
> > > do it?
> >
> > Jeremy
On Saturday 30 April 2016 23:46:41 Matt Fleming wrote:
>
> > It's not something we'd have to worry about in practice, but it does
> > make my patch incorrect. Should we come up with a different way to
> > do it?
>
> Jeremy proposed a patch to dynamically allocate the memory, which I
> think is
On Saturday 30 April 2016 23:46:41 Matt Fleming wrote:
>
> > It's not something we'd have to worry about in practice, but it does
> > make my patch incorrect. Should we come up with a different way to
> > do it?
>
> Jeremy proposed a patch to dynamically allocate the memory, which I
> think is
On Sun, 01 May, at 12:34:29AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
> The sys_restart() system call takes a mutex before calling kernel_restart()
> or kernel_poweroff().
>
> I've had a closer look now and found that there are a few other
> callers of kernel_restart, so I guess if you restart using sysctl
> at
On Sun, 01 May, at 12:34:29AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
> The sys_restart() system call takes a mutex before calling kernel_restart()
> or kernel_poweroff().
>
> I've had a closer look now and found that there are a few other
> callers of kernel_restart, so I guess if you restart using sysctl
> at
On Saturday 30 April 2016 21:14:49 Matt Fleming wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Apr, at 07:48:31PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > gcc complains about a newly added file for the EFI Bootloader Control:
> >
> > drivers/firmware/efi/efibc.c: In function 'efibc_set_variable':
> > drivers/firmware/efi/efibc.c:53:1:
On Saturday 30 April 2016 21:14:49 Matt Fleming wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Apr, at 07:48:31PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > gcc complains about a newly added file for the EFI Bootloader Control:
> >
> > drivers/firmware/efi/efibc.c: In function 'efibc_set_variable':
> > drivers/firmware/efi/efibc.c:53:1:
On Fri, 29 Apr, at 07:48:31PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> gcc complains about a newly added file for the EFI Bootloader Control:
>
> drivers/firmware/efi/efibc.c: In function 'efibc_set_variable':
> drivers/firmware/efi/efibc.c:53:1: error: the frame size of 2272 bytes is
> larger than 1024 bytes
On Fri, 29 Apr, at 07:48:31PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> gcc complains about a newly added file for the EFI Bootloader Control:
>
> drivers/firmware/efi/efibc.c: In function 'efibc_set_variable':
> drivers/firmware/efi/efibc.c:53:1: error: the frame size of 2272 bytes is
> larger than 1024 bytes
gcc complains about a newly added file for the EFI Bootloader Control:
drivers/firmware/efi/efibc.c: In function 'efibc_set_variable':
drivers/firmware/efi/efibc.c:53:1: error: the frame size of 2272 bytes is
larger than 1024 bytes [-Werror=frame-larger-than=]
The problem is the declaration of
gcc complains about a newly added file for the EFI Bootloader Control:
drivers/firmware/efi/efibc.c: In function 'efibc_set_variable':
drivers/firmware/efi/efibc.c:53:1: error: the frame size of 2272 bytes is
larger than 1024 bytes [-Werror=frame-larger-than=]
The problem is the declaration of
12 matches
Mail list logo
