On Sat, 26 Aug 2017 08:09:43 +0200
Peter Rosin wrote:
> On 2017-07-09 19:10, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> > On Fri, 7 Jul 2017 11:26:35 +0200
> > Peter Rosin wrote:
> >
> >> On 2017-07-07 06:57, Peter Rosin wrote:
> >>> On 2017-07-07 06:53, Gustavo A. R.
On Sat, 26 Aug 2017 08:09:43 +0200
Peter Rosin wrote:
> On 2017-07-09 19:10, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> > On Fri, 7 Jul 2017 11:26:35 +0200
> > Peter Rosin wrote:
> >
> >> On 2017-07-07 06:57, Peter Rosin wrote:
> >>> On 2017-07-07 06:53, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> Check return
On 2017-07-09 19:10, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Jul 2017 11:26:35 +0200
> Peter Rosin wrote:
>
>> On 2017-07-07 06:57, Peter Rosin wrote:
>>> On 2017-07-07 06:53, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
Check return values from call to devm_kzalloc() and devm_kmemup()
>>>
On 2017-07-09 19:10, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Jul 2017 11:26:35 +0200
> Peter Rosin wrote:
>
>> On 2017-07-07 06:57, Peter Rosin wrote:
>>> On 2017-07-07 06:53, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
Check return values from call to devm_kzalloc() and devm_kmemup()
>>>
>>> If someone
Hi Jonathan,
Quoting Jonathan Cameron :
On Fri, 7 Jul 2017 11:26:35 +0200
Peter Rosin wrote:
On 2017-07-07 06:57, Peter Rosin wrote:
> On 2017-07-07 06:53, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
>> Check return values from call to devm_kzalloc() and devm_kmemup()
>
>
Hi Jonathan,
Quoting Jonathan Cameron :
On Fri, 7 Jul 2017 11:26:35 +0200
Peter Rosin wrote:
On 2017-07-07 06:57, Peter Rosin wrote:
> On 2017-07-07 06:53, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
>> Check return values from call to devm_kzalloc() and devm_kmemup()
>
> If someone cares enough:
On Fri, 7 Jul 2017 11:26:35 +0200
Peter Rosin wrote:
> On 2017-07-07 06:57, Peter Rosin wrote:
> > On 2017-07-07 06:53, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> >> Check return values from call to devm_kzalloc() and devm_kmemup()
> >
> > If someone cares enough:
On Fri, 7 Jul 2017 11:26:35 +0200
Peter Rosin wrote:
> On 2017-07-07 06:57, Peter Rosin wrote:
> > On 2017-07-07 06:53, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> >> Check return values from call to devm_kzalloc() and devm_kmemup()
> >
> > If someone cares enough: s/devm_kmemup/evm_kmemdup/
>
>
On 2017-07-07 06:57, Peter Rosin wrote:
> On 2017-07-07 06:53, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
>> Check return values from call to devm_kzalloc() and devm_kmemup()
>
> If someone cares enough: s/devm_kmemup/evm_kmemdup/
Strange, there seems to be some inherent shortage of 'd' characters...
Cheers,
On 2017-07-07 06:57, Peter Rosin wrote:
> On 2017-07-07 06:53, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
>> Check return values from call to devm_kzalloc() and devm_kmemup()
>
> If someone cares enough: s/devm_kmemup/evm_kmemdup/
Strange, there seems to be some inherent shortage of 'd' characters...
Cheers,
On 2017-07-07 06:53, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> Check return values from call to devm_kzalloc() and devm_kmemup()
If someone cares enough: s/devm_kmemup/evm_kmemdup/
> in order to prevent a NULL pointer dereference.
>
> This issue was detected using Coccinelle and the following semantic
On 2017-07-07 06:53, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> Check return values from call to devm_kzalloc() and devm_kmemup()
If someone cares enough: s/devm_kmemup/evm_kmemdup/
> in order to prevent a NULL pointer dereference.
>
> This issue was detected using Coccinelle and the following semantic
Check return values from call to devm_kzalloc() and devm_kmemup()
in order to prevent a NULL pointer dereference.
This issue was detected using Coccinelle and the following semantic patch:
@@
expression x;
identifier fld;
@@
* x = devm_kzalloc(...);
... when != x == NULL
x->fld
Cc: Peter
Check return values from call to devm_kzalloc() and devm_kmemup()
in order to prevent a NULL pointer dereference.
This issue was detected using Coccinelle and the following semantic patch:
@@
expression x;
identifier fld;
@@
* x = devm_kzalloc(...);
... when != x == NULL
x->fld
Cc: Peter
14 matches
Mail list logo