Re: [PATCH] kconfig: replace 'oldnoconfig' with 'olddefconfig', what it really does

2012-08-23 Thread Adam Lee
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 04:10:01PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > Sorry for the late reply. > > On Fri, 2012-08-17 at 15:16 +0800, Adam Lee wrote: > > As 67d34a6a391369269a2e5dba8a5f42cc4cd50231 said, 'oldnoconfig' doesn't > > set new symbols to 'n', but instead sets it to their default values. >

Re: [PATCH] kconfig: replace 'oldnoconfig' with 'olddefconfig', what it really does

2012-08-23 Thread Steven Rostedt
Sorry for the late reply. On Fri, 2012-08-17 at 15:16 +0800, Adam Lee wrote: > As 67d34a6a391369269a2e5dba8a5f42cc4cd50231 said, 'oldnoconfig' doesn't > set new symbols to 'n', but instead sets it to their default values. > > So, this patch replace 'oldnoconfig' with 'olddefconfig', stop making

Re: [PATCH] kconfig: replace 'oldnoconfig' with 'olddefconfig', what it really does

2012-08-23 Thread Steven Rostedt
Sorry for the late reply. On Fri, 2012-08-17 at 15:16 +0800, Adam Lee wrote: As 67d34a6a391369269a2e5dba8a5f42cc4cd50231 said, 'oldnoconfig' doesn't set new symbols to 'n', but instead sets it to their default values. So, this patch replace 'oldnoconfig' with 'olddefconfig', stop making

Re: [PATCH] kconfig: replace 'oldnoconfig' with 'olddefconfig', what it really does

2012-08-23 Thread Adam Lee
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 04:10:01PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: Sorry for the late reply. On Fri, 2012-08-17 at 15:16 +0800, Adam Lee wrote: As 67d34a6a391369269a2e5dba8a5f42cc4cd50231 said, 'oldnoconfig' doesn't set new symbols to 'n', but instead sets it to their default values. So,

[PATCH] kconfig: replace 'oldnoconfig' with 'olddefconfig', what it really does

2012-08-17 Thread Adam Lee
As 67d34a6a391369269a2e5dba8a5f42cc4cd50231 said, 'oldnoconfig' doesn't set new symbols to 'n', but instead sets it to their default values. So, this patch replace 'oldnoconfig' with 'olddefconfig', stop making people confused. PS: the document in conf.c fixed in another mail, "[PATCH]

[PATCH] kconfig: replace 'oldnoconfig' with 'olddefconfig', what it really does

2012-08-17 Thread Adam Lee
As 67d34a6a391369269a2e5dba8a5f42cc4cd50231 said, 'oldnoconfig' doesn't set new symbols to 'n', but instead sets it to their default values. So, this patch replace 'oldnoconfig' with 'olddefconfig', stop making people confused. PS: the document in conf.c fixed in another mail, [PATCH]