On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 04:10:01PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> Sorry for the late reply.
>
> On Fri, 2012-08-17 at 15:16 +0800, Adam Lee wrote:
> > As 67d34a6a391369269a2e5dba8a5f42cc4cd50231 said, 'oldnoconfig' doesn't
> > set new symbols to 'n', but instead sets it to their default values.
>
Sorry for the late reply.
On Fri, 2012-08-17 at 15:16 +0800, Adam Lee wrote:
> As 67d34a6a391369269a2e5dba8a5f42cc4cd50231 said, 'oldnoconfig' doesn't
> set new symbols to 'n', but instead sets it to their default values.
>
> So, this patch replace 'oldnoconfig' with 'olddefconfig', stop making
Sorry for the late reply.
On Fri, 2012-08-17 at 15:16 +0800, Adam Lee wrote:
As 67d34a6a391369269a2e5dba8a5f42cc4cd50231 said, 'oldnoconfig' doesn't
set new symbols to 'n', but instead sets it to their default values.
So, this patch replace 'oldnoconfig' with 'olddefconfig', stop making
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 04:10:01PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
Sorry for the late reply.
On Fri, 2012-08-17 at 15:16 +0800, Adam Lee wrote:
As 67d34a6a391369269a2e5dba8a5f42cc4cd50231 said, 'oldnoconfig' doesn't
set new symbols to 'n', but instead sets it to their default values.
So,
As 67d34a6a391369269a2e5dba8a5f42cc4cd50231 said, 'oldnoconfig' doesn't
set new symbols to 'n', but instead sets it to their default values.
So, this patch replace 'oldnoconfig' with 'olddefconfig', stop making
people confused.
PS: the document in conf.c fixed in another mail, "[PATCH]
As 67d34a6a391369269a2e5dba8a5f42cc4cd50231 said, 'oldnoconfig' doesn't
set new symbols to 'n', but instead sets it to their default values.
So, this patch replace 'oldnoconfig' with 'olddefconfig', stop making
people confused.
PS: the document in conf.c fixed in another mail, [PATCH]
6 matches
Mail list logo