Re: [PATCH] m68k: Revive _TIF_* masks

2020-09-07 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 2:29 PM Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > While the core m68k code does not use the _TIF_* masks anymore, there > exists generic code that relies on their presence. Fortunately none of > that code is used on m68k, currently. > > Re-add the various _TIF_* masks, which were

Re: [PATCH] m68k: Revive _TIF_* masks

2020-08-26 Thread Greg Ungerer
Hi Geert, On 26/8/20 10:29 pm, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: While the core m68k code does not use the _TIF_* masks anymore, there exists generic code that relies on their presence. Fortunately none of that code is used on m68k, currently. Re-add the various _TIF_* masks, which were removed in

[PATCH] m68k: Revive _TIF_* masks

2020-08-26 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
While the core m68k code does not use the _TIF_* masks anymore, there exists generic code that relies on their presence. Fortunately none of that code is used on m68k, currently. Re-add the various _TIF_* masks, which were removed in commit cddafa3500fde4a0 ("m68k/m68knommu: merge MMU and