On Tue, 23 Dec 2014, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 10:11 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
>
> > My train of thought was that the original configuration has not
> > changed since 2011. I guess other regulators have been recently
> > introduced. Very well, applied to -fixes.
>
> Still
On Tue, 23 Dec 2014, Fabio Estevam wrote:
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 10:11 AM, Lee Jones lee.jo...@linaro.org wrote:
My train of thought was that the original configuration has not
changed since 2011. I guess other regulators have been recently
introduced. Very well, applied to -fixes.
Hi Lee,
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 10:11 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
> My train of thought was that the original configuration has not
> changed since 2011. I guess other regulators have been recently
> introduced. Very well, applied to -fixes.
Still don't see this patch in linux-next.
--
To
Hi Lee,
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 10:11 AM, Lee Jones lee.jo...@linaro.org wrote:
My train of thought was that the original configuration has not
changed since 2011. I guess other regulators have been recently
introduced. Very well, applied to -fixes.
Still don't see this patch in
On Wed, 10 Dec 2014, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 09:46:50AM +, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Tue, 09 Dec 2014, Fabio Estevam wrote:
>
> > > Tested on a imx53-qsb board, where multiple DA9053 regulators can be
> > > successfully probed.
>
> > Applied for v3.20, thanks.
>
> Fabio
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 09:46:50AM +, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Tue, 09 Dec 2014, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> > Tested on a imx53-qsb board, where multiple DA9053 regulators can be
> > successfully probed.
> Applied for v3.20, thanks.
Fabio was saying that -next is broken which presumably means
On Tue, 09 Dec 2014, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> From: Fabio Estevam
>
> Allow multiple DA9052 regulators be registered by registering with
> PLATFORM_DEVID_AUTO instead of PLATFORM_DEVID_NONE.
>
> The subdevices are currently registered with PLATFORM_DEVID_NONE, which
> will cause a name
On Tue, 09 Dec 2014, Fabio Estevam wrote:
From: Fabio Estevam fabio.este...@freescale.com
Allow multiple DA9052 regulators be registered by registering with
PLATFORM_DEVID_AUTO instead of PLATFORM_DEVID_NONE.
The subdevices are currently registered with PLATFORM_DEVID_NONE, which
will
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 09:46:50AM +, Lee Jones wrote:
On Tue, 09 Dec 2014, Fabio Estevam wrote:
Tested on a imx53-qsb board, where multiple DA9053 regulators can be
successfully probed.
Applied for v3.20, thanks.
Fabio was saying that -next is broken which presumably means that
On Wed, 10 Dec 2014, Mark Brown wrote:
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 09:46:50AM +, Lee Jones wrote:
On Tue, 09 Dec 2014, Fabio Estevam wrote:
Tested on a imx53-qsb board, where multiple DA9053 regulators can be
successfully probed.
Applied for v3.20, thanks.
Fabio was saying that
From: Fabio Estevam
Allow multiple DA9052 regulators be registered by registering with
PLATFORM_DEVID_AUTO instead of PLATFORM_DEVID_NONE.
The subdevices are currently registered with PLATFORM_DEVID_NONE, which
will cause a name collision on the platform bus when multiple regulators
are
From: Fabio Estevam fabio.este...@freescale.com
Allow multiple DA9052 regulators be registered by registering with
PLATFORM_DEVID_AUTO instead of PLATFORM_DEVID_NONE.
The subdevices are currently registered with PLATFORM_DEVID_NONE, which
will cause a name collision on the platform bus when
12 matches
Mail list logo
