On 03/06/2014 11:08 AM, Naoya Horiguchi wrote:
> And I found my patch was totally wrong because it should check
> !pte_present(), not pte_present().
> I'm testing fixed one (see below), and the problem seems not to reproduce
> in my environment at least for now.
> But I'm not 100% sure, so I need
On 03/06/2014 11:08 AM, Naoya Horiguchi wrote:
And I found my patch was totally wrong because it should check
!pte_present(), not pte_present().
I'm testing fixed one (see below), and the problem seems not to reproduce
in my environment at least for now.
But I'm not 100% sure, so I need your
On 03/04/2014 06:49 PM, Naoya Horiguchi wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 04, 2014 at 05:46:52PM -0500, Sasha Levin wrote:
>> On 03/04/2014 04:32 PM, Naoya Horiguchi wrote:
>>> # sorry if duplicate message
>>>
>>> On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 04:38:41PM -0500, Sasha Levin wrote:
On 03/03/2014 03:06 PM, Sasha
On 03/04/2014 06:49 PM, Naoya Horiguchi wrote:
On Tue, Mar 04, 2014 at 05:46:52PM -0500, Sasha Levin wrote:
On 03/04/2014 04:32 PM, Naoya Horiguchi wrote:
# sorry if duplicate message
On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 04:38:41PM -0500, Sasha Levin wrote:
On 03/03/2014 03:06 PM, Sasha Levin wrote:
On
On 03/04/2014 04:32 PM, Naoya Horiguchi wrote:
> # sorry if duplicate message
>
> On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 04:38:41PM -0500, Sasha Levin wrote:
>> On 03/03/2014 03:06 PM, Sasha Levin wrote:
>>> On 03/03/2014 12:02 AM, Naoya Horiguchi wrote:
Hi Sasha,
>> I can confirm that with this
On 03/04/2014 04:32 PM, Naoya Horiguchi wrote:
# sorry if duplicate message
On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 04:38:41PM -0500, Sasha Levin wrote:
On 03/03/2014 03:06 PM, Sasha Levin wrote:
On 03/03/2014 12:02 AM, Naoya Horiguchi wrote:
Hi Sasha,
I can confirm that with this patch the lockdep issue
On 03/03/2014 03:06 PM, Sasha Levin wrote:
On 03/03/2014 12:02 AM, Naoya Horiguchi wrote:
Hi Sasha,
>I can confirm that with this patch the lockdep issue is gone. However, the
NULL deref in
>walk_pte_range() and the BUG at mm/hugemem.c:3580 still appear.
I spotted the cause of this problem.
On 03/03/2014 12:02 AM, Naoya Horiguchi wrote:
Hi Sasha,
>I can confirm that with this patch the lockdep issue is gone. However, the
NULL deref in
>walk_pte_range() and the BUG at mm/hugemem.c:3580 still appear.
I spotted the cause of this problem.
Could you try testing if this patch fixes
On 03/03/2014 12:02 AM, Naoya Horiguchi wrote:
Hi Sasha,
I can confirm that with this patch the lockdep issue is gone. However, the
NULL deref in
walk_pte_range() and the BUG at mm/hugemem.c:3580 still appear.
I spotted the cause of this problem.
Could you try testing if this patch fixes it?
On 03/03/2014 03:06 PM, Sasha Levin wrote:
On 03/03/2014 12:02 AM, Naoya Horiguchi wrote:
Hi Sasha,
I can confirm that with this patch the lockdep issue is gone. However, the
NULL deref in
walk_pte_range() and the BUG at mm/hugemem.c:3580 still appear.
I spotted the cause of this problem.
Hi Sasha,
> I can confirm that with this patch the lockdep issue is gone. However, the
> NULL deref in
> walk_pte_range() and the BUG at mm/hugemem.c:3580 still appear.
I spotted the cause of this problem.
Could you try testing if this patch fixes it?
Thanks,
Naoya
---
Page table walker
Hi Sasha,
I can confirm that with this patch the lockdep issue is gone. However, the
NULL deref in
walk_pte_range() and the BUG at mm/hugemem.c:3580 still appear.
I spotted the cause of this problem.
Could you try testing if this patch fixes it?
Thanks,
Naoya
---
Page table walker doesn't
12 matches
Mail list logo