On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 7:08 AM, David Miller wrote:
> Looks good, applied, thanks.
Great. Probably not a show stopper, but it would be nice to see this in stable.
On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 7:08 AM, David Miller wrote:
> Looks good, applied, thanks.
Great. Probably not a show stopper, but it would be nice to see this in stable.
From: "Jason A. Donenfeld"
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 11:14:53 +0200
> The implementation of net_dbg_ratelimited in the CONFIG_DYNAMIC_DEBUG
> case was added with 2c94b5373 ("net: Implement net_dbg_ratelimited() for
> CONFIG_DYNAMIC_DEBUG case"). The implementation strategy was to
From: "Jason A. Donenfeld"
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 11:14:53 +0200
> The implementation of net_dbg_ratelimited in the CONFIG_DYNAMIC_DEBUG
> case was added with 2c94b5373 ("net: Implement net_dbg_ratelimited() for
> CONFIG_DYNAMIC_DEBUG case"). The implementation strategy was to take the
> usual
The implementation of net_dbg_ratelimited in the CONFIG_DYNAMIC_DEBUG
case was added with 2c94b5373 ("net: Implement net_dbg_ratelimited() for
CONFIG_DYNAMIC_DEBUG case"). The implementation strategy was to take the
usual definition of the dynamic_pr_debug macro, but alter it by adding a
call to
The implementation of net_dbg_ratelimited in the CONFIG_DYNAMIC_DEBUG
case was added with 2c94b5373 ("net: Implement net_dbg_ratelimited() for
CONFIG_DYNAMIC_DEBUG case"). The implementation strategy was to take the
usual definition of the dynamic_pr_debug macro, but alter it by adding a
call to
6 matches
Mail list logo