On 04/11/2013 09:46 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
On Thu, 2013-04-11 at 21:11 +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
With recent support for GRO, there is no need to keep both LRO and
GRO. This patch therefore removes the deprecated inet_lro support
from mv643xx_eth. This is work is based on an
On Thu, 2013-04-11 at 21:11 +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
> With recent support for GRO, there is no need to keep both LRO and
> GRO. This patch therefore removes the deprecated inet_lro support
> from mv643xx_eth. This is work is based on an experimental patch
> provided by Eric Dumazet and
With recent support for GRO, there is no need to keep both LRO and
GRO. This patch therefore removes the deprecated inet_lro support
from mv643xx_eth. This is work is based on an experimental patch
provided by Eric Dumazet and Willy Tarreau.
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Hesselbarth
With recent support for GRO, there is no need to keep both LRO and
GRO. This patch therefore removes the deprecated inet_lro support
from mv643xx_eth. This is work is based on an experimental patch
provided by Eric Dumazet and Willy Tarreau.
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Hesselbarth
On Thu, 2013-04-11 at 21:11 +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
With recent support for GRO, there is no need to keep both LRO and
GRO. This patch therefore removes the deprecated inet_lro support
from mv643xx_eth. This is work is based on an experimental patch
provided by Eric Dumazet and
On 04/11/2013 09:46 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
On Thu, 2013-04-11 at 21:11 +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
With recent support for GRO, there is no need to keep both LRO and
GRO. This patch therefore removes the deprecated inet_lro support
from mv643xx_eth. This is work is based on an
6 matches
Mail list logo
