On 9/6/2015 8:50 PM, Frank Rowand wrote:
> On 9/6/2015 7:16 PM, Frank Rowand wrote:
>> On 9/6/2015 1:46 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
>>> On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 8:14 PM, Frank Rowand wrote:
On 9/4/2015 12:12 PM, David Daney wrote:
> From: David Daney
>
> It is perfectly legitimate for
On 9/6/2015 8:50 PM, Frank Rowand wrote:
> On 9/6/2015 7:16 PM, Frank Rowand wrote:
>> On 9/6/2015 1:46 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
>>> On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 8:14 PM, Frank Rowand wrote:
On 9/4/2015 12:12 PM, David Daney wrote:
> From: David Daney
On 9/6/2015 7:16 PM, Frank Rowand wrote:
> On 9/6/2015 1:46 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 8:14 PM, Frank Rowand wrote:
>>> On 9/4/2015 12:12 PM, David Daney wrote:
From: David Daney
It is perfectly legitimate for a PCI device to have an
PCI_INTERRUPT_PIN
On 9/6/2015 1:46 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 8:14 PM, Frank Rowand wrote:
>> On 9/4/2015 12:12 PM, David Daney wrote:
>>> From: David Daney
>>>
>>> It is perfectly legitimate for a PCI device to have an
>>> PCI_INTERRUPT_PIN value of zero. This happens if the device doesn't
On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 8:14 PM, Frank Rowand wrote:
> On 9/4/2015 12:12 PM, David Daney wrote:
>> From: David Daney
>>
>> It is perfectly legitimate for a PCI device to have an
>> PCI_INTERRUPT_PIN value of zero. This happens if the device doesn't
>> use interrupts, or on PCIe devices, where
On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 8:14 PM, Frank Rowand wrote:
> On 9/4/2015 12:12 PM, David Daney wrote:
>> From: David Daney
>>
>> It is perfectly legitimate for a PCI device to have an
>> PCI_INTERRUPT_PIN value of zero. This happens if the device doesn't
On 9/6/2015 1:46 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 8:14 PM, Frank Rowand wrote:
>> On 9/4/2015 12:12 PM, David Daney wrote:
>>> From: David Daney
>>>
>>> It is perfectly legitimate for a PCI device to have an
>>> PCI_INTERRUPT_PIN
On 9/6/2015 7:16 PM, Frank Rowand wrote:
> On 9/6/2015 1:46 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 8:14 PM, Frank Rowand wrote:
>>> On 9/4/2015 12:12 PM, David Daney wrote:
From: David Daney
It is perfectly legitimate for a
On 9/4/2015 6:40 PM, David Daney wrote:
> On 09/04/2015 06:14 PM, Frank Rowand wrote:
>> On 9/4/2015 12:12 PM, David Daney wrote:
>>> From: David Daney
>>>
>>> It is perfectly legitimate for a PCI device to have an
>>> PCI_INTERRUPT_PIN value of zero. This happens if the device doesn't
>>> use
On 09/04/2015 06:14 PM, Frank Rowand wrote:
On 9/4/2015 12:12 PM, David Daney wrote:
From: David Daney
It is perfectly legitimate for a PCI device to have an
PCI_INTERRUPT_PIN value of zero. This happens if the device doesn't
use interrupts, or on PCIe devices, where only MSI/MSI-X are
On 9/4/2015 12:12 PM, David Daney wrote:
> From: David Daney
>
> It is perfectly legitimate for a PCI device to have an
> PCI_INTERRUPT_PIN value of zero. This happens if the device doesn't
> use interrupts, or on PCIe devices, where only MSI/MSI-X are
> supported.
>
> Silence the annoying
From: David Daney
It is perfectly legitimate for a PCI device to have an
PCI_INTERRUPT_PIN value of zero. This happens if the device doesn't
use interrupts, or on PCIe devices, where only MSI/MSI-X are
supported.
Silence the annoying "of_irq_parse_pci() failed with rc=-19" error
messages by
From: David Daney
It is perfectly legitimate for a PCI device to have an
PCI_INTERRUPT_PIN value of zero. This happens if the device doesn't
use interrupts, or on PCIe devices, where only MSI/MSI-X are
supported.
Silence the annoying "of_irq_parse_pci() failed with
On 09/04/2015 06:14 PM, Frank Rowand wrote:
On 9/4/2015 12:12 PM, David Daney wrote:
From: David Daney
It is perfectly legitimate for a PCI device to have an
PCI_INTERRUPT_PIN value of zero. This happens if the device doesn't
use interrupts, or on PCIe devices, where
On 9/4/2015 6:40 PM, David Daney wrote:
> On 09/04/2015 06:14 PM, Frank Rowand wrote:
>> On 9/4/2015 12:12 PM, David Daney wrote:
>>> From: David Daney
>>>
>>> It is perfectly legitimate for a PCI device to have an
>>> PCI_INTERRUPT_PIN value of zero. This happens if the
On 9/4/2015 12:12 PM, David Daney wrote:
> From: David Daney
>
> It is perfectly legitimate for a PCI device to have an
> PCI_INTERRUPT_PIN value of zero. This happens if the device doesn't
> use interrupts, or on PCIe devices, where only MSI/MSI-X are
> supported.
>
>
16 matches
Mail list logo