On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 6:56 AM, Jeffy Chen wrote:
> Currently we are trying to enable/disable the clk of irq's gpio bank when
> unmask/mask irq. But the kernel's "lazy disable approach" will skip masking
> irq when the irq chip doesn't support irq_disable ops.
>
> So
On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 6:56 AM, Jeffy Chen wrote:
> Currently we are trying to enable/disable the clk of irq's gpio bank when
> unmask/mask irq. But the kernel's "lazy disable approach" will skip masking
> irq when the irq chip doesn't support irq_disable ops.
>
> So we may hit this case:
>
Am Donnerstag, 2. März 2017, 13:56:52 CET schrieb Jeffy Chen:
> Currently we are trying to enable/disable the clk of irq's gpio bank when
> unmask/mask irq. But the kernel's "lazy disable approach" will skip masking
> irq when the irq chip doesn't support irq_disable ops.
>
> So we may hit this
Am Donnerstag, 2. März 2017, 13:56:52 CET schrieb Jeffy Chen:
> Currently we are trying to enable/disable the clk of irq's gpio bank when
> unmask/mask irq. But the kernel's "lazy disable approach" will skip masking
> irq when the irq chip doesn't support irq_disable ops.
>
> So we may hit this
Hi Linus,
Am Dienstag, 14. März 2017, 16:03:48 CET schrieb Linus Walleij:
> On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 6:56 AM, Jeffy Chen
wrote:
> > Currently we are trying to enable/disable the clk of irq's gpio bank when
> > unmask/mask irq. But the kernel's "lazy disable approach"
Hi Linus,
Am Dienstag, 14. März 2017, 16:03:48 CET schrieb Linus Walleij:
> On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 6:56 AM, Jeffy Chen
wrote:
> > Currently we are trying to enable/disable the clk of irq's gpio bank when
> > unmask/mask irq. But the kernel's "lazy disable approach" will skip
> > masking
> > irq
On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 6:56 AM, Jeffy Chen wrote:
> Currently we are trying to enable/disable the clk of irq's gpio bank when
> unmask/mask irq. But the kernel's "lazy disable approach" will skip masking
> irq when the irq chip doesn't support irq_disable ops.
>
> So
On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 6:56 AM, Jeffy Chen wrote:
> Currently we are trying to enable/disable the clk of irq's gpio bank when
> unmask/mask irq. But the kernel's "lazy disable approach" will skip masking
> irq when the irq chip doesn't support irq_disable ops.
>
> So we may hit this case:
>
Currently we are trying to enable/disable the clk of irq's gpio bank when
unmask/mask irq. But the kernel's "lazy disable approach" will skip masking
irq when the irq chip doesn't support irq_disable ops.
So we may hit this case:
irq_enable-> enable clk
irq_disable-> noop
Currently we are trying to enable/disable the clk of irq's gpio bank when
unmask/mask irq. But the kernel's "lazy disable approach" will skip masking
irq when the irq chip doesn't support irq_disable ops.
So we may hit this case:
irq_enable-> enable clk
irq_disable-> noop
10 matches
Mail list logo