> > sasha.nef...@intel.com; platform-driver-...@vger.kernel.org; linux-
> > ker...@vger.kernel.org; intel-wired-...@lists.osuosl.org
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH] platform/x86: intel_pmc: Ignore GBE LTR on
> > Tiger Lake
> > platforms
> >
> >
> > [EX
rnel.org; intel-wired-...@lists.osuosl.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] platform/x86: intel_pmc: Ignore GBE LTR on Tiger Lake
> platforms
>
>
> [EXTERNAL EMAIL]
>
> On Mon, Mar 8, 2021 at 12:20 PM Limonciello, Mario
> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > [EXTERNAL EMAIL]
>
On Mon, Mar 8, 2021 at 12:20 PM Limonciello, Mario
wrote:
>
> >
> > [EXTERNAL EMAIL]
> >
> > Due to a HW limitation, the Latency Tolerance Reporting (LTR) value
> > programmed in the Tiger Lake GBE controller is not large enough to allow
> > the platform to enter Package C10, which in turn
>
> [EXTERNAL EMAIL]
>
> Due to a HW limitation, the Latency Tolerance Reporting (LTR) value
> programmed in the Tiger Lake GBE controller is not large enough to allow
> the platform to enter Package C10, which in turn prevents the platform from
> achieving its low power target during
Hi Rajneesh,
On Mon, 2021-03-08 at 09:04 -0500, Rajneesh Bhardwaj wrote:
> Hi David
>
> Overall, it looks like the right thing to do but i have a few
> comments. See below.
>
> On Fri, Mar 5, 2021 at 2:07 PM David E. Box <
> david.e@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > Due to a HW limitation,
On Mon, Mar 8, 2021 at 9:04 AM Rajneesh Bhardwaj
wrote:
>
> Hi David
>
> Overall, it looks like the right thing to do but i have a few
> comments. See below.
>
> On Fri, Mar 5, 2021 at 2:07 PM David E. Box
> wrote:
> >
> > Due to a HW limitation, the Latency Tolerance Reporting (LTR) value
> >
Hi David
Overall, it looks like the right thing to do but i have a few
comments. See below.
On Fri, Mar 5, 2021 at 2:07 PM David E. Box wrote:
>
> Due to a HW limitation, the Latency Tolerance Reporting (LTR) value
> programmed in the Tiger Lake GBE controller is not large enough to allow
> the
Hi,
On 3/7/21 9:39 AM, Neftin, Sasha wrote:
> On 3/5/2021 21:06, David E. Box wrote:
>> Due to a HW limitation, the Latency Tolerance Reporting (LTR) value
>> programmed in the Tiger Lake GBE controller is not large enough to allow
>> the platform to enter Package C10, which in turn prevents the
Hi Sasha,
On Sun, 2021-03-07 at 10:39 +0200, Neftin, Sasha wrote:
> On 3/5/2021 21:06, David E. Box wrote:
> > Due to a HW limitation, the Latency Tolerance Reporting (LTR) value
> > programmed in the Tiger Lake GBE controller is not large enough to
> > allow
> > the platform to enter Package
On 3/5/2021 21:06, David E. Box wrote:
Due to a HW limitation, the Latency Tolerance Reporting (LTR) value
programmed in the Tiger Lake GBE controller is not large enough to allow
the platform to enter Package C10, which in turn prevents the platform from
achieving its low power target during
Due to a HW limitation, the Latency Tolerance Reporting (LTR) value
programmed in the Tiger Lake GBE controller is not large enough to allow
the platform to enter Package C10, which in turn prevents the platform from
achieving its low power target during suspend-to-idle. Ignore the GBE LTR
value
11 matches
Mail list logo
