y G Varghese; Guenter Roeck
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/fsl: Add support for pci(e) machine check
> exception on E500MC / E5500
>
> On Tue, 2014-10-07 at 22:08 -0500, Jia Hongtao-B38951 wrote:
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Wood Sco
nuxppc-
> > d...@lists.ozlabs.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Jojy G Varghese;
> > Guenter Roeck; Jia Hongtao-B38951
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/fsl: Add support for pci(e) machine check
> > exception on E500MC / E5500
> >
> > On Mon, 2014-0
@vger.kernel.org; Jojy G Varghese;
Guenter Roeck; Jia Hongtao-B38951
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/fsl: Add support for pci(e) machine check
exception on E500MC / E5500
On Mon, 2014-09-29 at 09:48 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
From: Jojy G Varghese jo...@juniper.net
For E500MC and E5500
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/fsl: Add support for pci(e) machine check
exception on E500MC / E5500
On Tue, 2014-10-07 at 22:08 -0500, Jia Hongtao-B38951 wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Wood Scott-B07421
Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2014 2:36 AM
To: Guenter Roeck
Cc: Benjamin
k; Jia Hongtao-B38951
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/fsl: Add support for pci(e) machine check
> exception on E500MC / E5500
>
> On Tue, 2014-09-30 at 08:50 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 06:31:06PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
> > > On Mon
er Roeck; Jia Hongtao-B38951
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/fsl: Add support for pci(e) machine check
> exception on E500MC / E5500
>
> On Mon, 2014-09-29 at 09:48 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > From: Jojy G Varghese
> >
> > For E500MC and E5500, a machine check exce
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/fsl: Add support for pci(e) machine check
exception on E500MC / E5500
On Mon, 2014-09-29 at 09:48 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
From: Jojy G Varghese jo...@juniper.net
For E500MC and E5500, a machine check exception in pci(e) memory space
crashes the kernel
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/fsl: Add support for pci(e) machine check
exception on E500MC / E5500
On Tue, 2014-09-30 at 08:50 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 06:31:06PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
On Mon, 2014-09-29 at 23:03 +, Jojy Varghese wrote:
On 9/29/14 12:06
On Tue, 2014-09-30 at 08:50 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 06:31:06PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
> > On Mon, 2014-09-29 at 23:03 +, Jojy Varghese wrote:
> > >
> > > On 9/29/14 12:06 PM, "Guenter Roeck" wrote:
> > >
> > > >Those are errors related to PCIe hotplug, and
On 9/30/14 8:50 AM, "Guenter Roeck" wrote:
>On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 06:31:06PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
>> On Mon, 2014-09-29 at 23:03 +, Jojy Varghese wrote:
>> >
>> > On 9/29/14 12:06 PM, "Guenter Roeck" wrote:
>> >
>> > >On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 01:36:06PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
>>
On 9/30/14 1:17 PM, "Scott Wood" wrote:
>On Tue, 2014-09-30 at 20:15 +, Jojy Varghese wrote:
>>
>> On 9/30/14 8:50 AM, "Guenter Roeck" wrote:
>>
>> >On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 06:31:06PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
>> >> Which specific chip and revision did you see this on? What is the
On Tue, 2014-09-30 at 20:15 +, Jojy Varghese wrote:
>
> On 9/30/14 8:50 AM, "Guenter Roeck" wrote:
>
> >On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 06:31:06PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
> >> Which specific chip and revision did you see this on? What is the value
> >> in MCSR?
> >>
> >Jojy can answer that, at
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 06:31:06PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-09-29 at 23:03 +, Jojy Varghese wrote:
> >
> > On 9/29/14 12:06 PM, "Guenter Roeck" wrote:
> >
> > >On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 01:36:06PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
> > >> On Mon, 2014-09-29 at 09:48 -0700, Guenter Roeck
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 06:31:06PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
On Mon, 2014-09-29 at 23:03 +, Jojy Varghese wrote:
On 9/29/14 12:06 PM, Guenter Roeck li...@roeck-us.net wrote:
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 01:36:06PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
On Mon, 2014-09-29 at 09:48 -0700, Guenter
On Tue, 2014-09-30 at 20:15 +, Jojy Varghese wrote:
On 9/30/14 8:50 AM, Guenter Roeck li...@roeck-us.net wrote:
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 06:31:06PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
Which specific chip and revision did you see this on? What is the value
in MCSR?
Jojy can answer that, at
On 9/30/14 1:17 PM, Scott Wood scottw...@freescale.com wrote:
On Tue, 2014-09-30 at 20:15 +, Jojy Varghese wrote:
On 9/30/14 8:50 AM, Guenter Roeck li...@roeck-us.net wrote:
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 06:31:06PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
Which specific chip and revision did you see this
On 9/30/14 8:50 AM, Guenter Roeck li...@roeck-us.net wrote:
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 06:31:06PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
On Mon, 2014-09-29 at 23:03 +, Jojy Varghese wrote:
On 9/29/14 12:06 PM, Guenter Roeck li...@roeck-us.net wrote:
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 01:36:06PM -0500, Scott
On Tue, 2014-09-30 at 08:50 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 06:31:06PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
On Mon, 2014-09-29 at 23:03 +, Jojy Varghese wrote:
On 9/29/14 12:06 PM, Guenter Roeck li...@roeck-us.net wrote:
Those are errors related to PCIe hotplug, and
On 9/29/14 12:06 PM, "Guenter Roeck" wrote:
>On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 01:36:06PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
>> On Mon, 2014-09-29 at 09:48 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>> > From: Jojy G Varghese
>> >
>> > For E500MC and E5500, a machine check exception in pci(e) memory space
>> > crashes the
On Mon, 2014-09-29 at 23:03 +, Jojy Varghese wrote:
>
> On 9/29/14 12:06 PM, "Guenter Roeck" wrote:
>
> >On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 01:36:06PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
> >> On Mon, 2014-09-29 at 09:48 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> >> > From: Jojy G Varghese
> >> >
> >> > For E500MC and
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 01:36:06PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-09-29 at 09:48 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > From: Jojy G Varghese
> >
> > For E500MC and E5500, a machine check exception in pci(e) memory space
> > crashes the kernel.
> >
> > Testing shows that the MCAR(U) register
On Mon, 2014-09-29 at 09:48 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> From: Jojy G Varghese
>
> For E500MC and E5500, a machine check exception in pci(e) memory space
> crashes the kernel.
>
> Testing shows that the MCAR(U) register is zero on a MC exception for the
> E5500 core. At the same time, DEAR
From: Jojy G Varghese
For E500MC and E5500, a machine check exception in pci(e) memory space
crashes the kernel.
Testing shows that the MCAR(U) register is zero on a MC exception for the
E5500 core. At the same time, DEAR register has been found to have the
address of the faulty load address
From: Jojy G Varghese jo...@juniper.net
For E500MC and E5500, a machine check exception in pci(e) memory space
crashes the kernel.
Testing shows that the MCAR(U) register is zero on a MC exception for the
E5500 core. At the same time, DEAR register has been found to have the
address of the
On Mon, 2014-09-29 at 09:48 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
From: Jojy G Varghese jo...@juniper.net
For E500MC and E5500, a machine check exception in pci(e) memory space
crashes the kernel.
Testing shows that the MCAR(U) register is zero on a MC exception for the
E5500 core. At the same
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 01:36:06PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
On Mon, 2014-09-29 at 09:48 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
From: Jojy G Varghese jo...@juniper.net
For E500MC and E5500, a machine check exception in pci(e) memory space
crashes the kernel.
Testing shows that the MCAR(U)
On Mon, 2014-09-29 at 23:03 +, Jojy Varghese wrote:
On 9/29/14 12:06 PM, Guenter Roeck li...@roeck-us.net wrote:
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 01:36:06PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
On Mon, 2014-09-29 at 09:48 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
From: Jojy G Varghese jo...@juniper.net
For
On 9/29/14 12:06 PM, Guenter Roeck li...@roeck-us.net wrote:
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 01:36:06PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
On Mon, 2014-09-29 at 09:48 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
From: Jojy G Varghese jo...@juniper.net
For E500MC and E5500, a machine check exception in pci(e) memory space
28 matches
Mail list logo
