On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 09:38:50AM +0800, Axel Lin wrote:
> It looks pointless to pass max_vol to s5m8767_convert_voltage_to_sel().
> Compare selected voltage to desc->max is enough to ensure selected voltage
> is in supported range.
Applied, thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the
On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 09:38:50AM +0800, Axel Lin wrote:
It looks pointless to pass max_vol to s5m8767_convert_voltage_to_sel().
Compare selected voltage to desc-max is enough to ensure selected voltage
is in supported range.
Applied, thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 09:38:50AM +0800, Axel Lin wrote:
> It looks pointless to pass max_vol to s5m8767_convert_voltage_to_sel().
> Compare selected voltage to desc->max is enough to ensure selected voltage
> is in supported range.
This doesn't apply against -rc2, can you please regenerate?
On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 09:38:50AM +0800, Axel Lin wrote:
It looks pointless to pass max_vol to s5m8767_convert_voltage_to_sel().
Compare selected voltage to desc-max is enough to ensure selected voltage
is in supported range.
This doesn't apply against -rc2, can you please regenerate?
It looks pointless to pass max_vol to s5m8767_convert_voltage_to_sel().
Compare selected voltage to desc->max is enough to ensure selected voltage
is in supported range.
Signed-off-by: Axel Lin
---
drivers/regulator/s5m8767.c | 33 ++---
1 file changed, 10
It looks pointless to pass max_vol to s5m8767_convert_voltage_to_sel().
Compare selected voltage to desc-max is enough to ensure selected voltage
is in supported range.
Signed-off-by: Axel Lin axel@ingics.com
---
drivers/regulator/s5m8767.c | 33 ++---
1 file
6 matches
Mail list logo