On 09/08/14 08:43, Mimi Zohar wrote:
Behan, thank you for the explanation.
No worries. I should have explained better. My apologies.
The same snippet of code used
here, and elsewhere in the kernel, is taken from the crypto subsystem.
Once it is resolved in the crypto subsystem, the same
On Mon, 2014-09-08 at 07:25 -0500, Behan Webster wrote:
> On 09/08/14 04:15, Dmitry Kasatkin wrote:
> > On 07/09/14 05:06, Behan Webster wrote:
> >> On 09/06/14 03:11, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> >>> On Fri, 5 Sep 2014, Behan Webster wrote:
> On 09/05/14 17:18, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> >>
On 09/08/14 04:15, Dmitry Kasatkin wrote:
On 07/09/14 05:06, Behan Webster wrote:
On 09/06/14 03:11, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Fri, 5 Sep 2014, Behan Webster wrote:
On 09/05/14 17:18, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
Signed-off-by: Behan Webster
Signed-off-by: Mark Charlebois
Signed-off-by:
On 07/09/14 05:06, Behan Webster wrote:
> On 09/06/14 03:11, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> On Fri, 5 Sep 2014, Behan Webster wrote:
>>> On 09/05/14 17:18, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Behan Webster
> Signed-off-by: Mark Charlebois
> Signed-off-by: Jan-Simon Möller
This
On 07/09/14 05:06, Behan Webster wrote:
On 09/06/14 03:11, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Fri, 5 Sep 2014, Behan Webster wrote:
On 09/05/14 17:18, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
Signed-off-by: Behan Webster beh...@converseincode.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Charlebois charl...@gmail.com
Signed-off-by:
On 09/08/14 04:15, Dmitry Kasatkin wrote:
On 07/09/14 05:06, Behan Webster wrote:
On 09/06/14 03:11, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Fri, 5 Sep 2014, Behan Webster wrote:
On 09/05/14 17:18, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
Signed-off-by: Behan Webster beh...@converseincode.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Charlebois
On Mon, 2014-09-08 at 07:25 -0500, Behan Webster wrote:
On 09/08/14 04:15, Dmitry Kasatkin wrote:
On 07/09/14 05:06, Behan Webster wrote:
On 09/06/14 03:11, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Fri, 5 Sep 2014, Behan Webster wrote:
On 09/05/14 17:18, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
Signed-off-by: Behan
On 09/08/14 08:43, Mimi Zohar wrote:
Behan, thank you for the explanation.
No worries. I should have explained better. My apologies.
The same snippet of code used
here, and elsewhere in the kernel, is taken from the crypto subsystem.
Once it is resolved in the crypto subsystem, the same
On 09/06/14 03:11, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Fri, 5 Sep 2014, Behan Webster wrote:
On 09/05/14 17:18, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
Signed-off-by: Behan Webster
Signed-off-by: Mark Charlebois
Signed-off-by: Jan-Simon Möller
This SOB chain is completely ass backwards. See Documentation/...
"The
On Fri, 5 Sep 2014, Behan Webster wrote:
> On 09/05/14 17:18, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > > Signed-off-by: Behan Webster
> > > Signed-off-by: Mark Charlebois
> > > Signed-off-by: Jan-Simon Möller
> > This SOB chain is completely ass backwards. See Documentation/...
> "The Signed-off-by: tag
On Fri, 5 Sep 2014, Behan Webster wrote:
On 09/05/14 17:18, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
Signed-off-by: Behan Webster beh...@converseincode.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Charlebois charl...@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Jan-Simon Möller dl...@gmx.de
This SOB chain is completely ass backwards. See
On 09/06/14 03:11, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Fri, 5 Sep 2014, Behan Webster wrote:
On 09/05/14 17:18, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
Signed-off-by: Behan Webster beh...@converseincode.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Charlebois charl...@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Jan-Simon Möller dl...@gmx.de
This SOB chain is
On 09/05/14 17:18, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Fri, 5 Sep 2014, beh...@converseincode.com wrote:
From: Behan Webster
Replaced the use of a Variable Length Array In Struct (VLAIS) with a C99
compliant equivalent. This patch allocates the appropriate amount of memory
using an char array.
The
On Fri, 5 Sep 2014, beh...@converseincode.com wrote:
> From: Behan Webster
>
> Replaced the use of a Variable Length Array In Struct (VLAIS) with a C99
> compliant equivalent. This patch allocates the appropriate amount of memory
> using an char array.
>
> The new code can be compiled with
From: Behan Webster
Replaced the use of a Variable Length Array In Struct (VLAIS) with a C99
compliant equivalent. This patch allocates the appropriate amount of memory
using an char array.
The new code can be compiled with both gcc and clang.
struct shash_desc contains a flexible array member
From: Behan Webster beh...@converseincode.com
Replaced the use of a Variable Length Array In Struct (VLAIS) with a C99
compliant equivalent. This patch allocates the appropriate amount of memory
using an char array.
The new code can be compiled with both gcc and clang.
struct shash_desc
On Fri, 5 Sep 2014, beh...@converseincode.com wrote:
From: Behan Webster beh...@converseincode.com
Replaced the use of a Variable Length Array In Struct (VLAIS) with a C99
compliant equivalent. This patch allocates the appropriate amount of memory
using an char array.
The new code can be
On 09/05/14 17:18, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Fri, 5 Sep 2014, beh...@converseincode.com wrote:
From: Behan Webster beh...@converseincode.com
Replaced the use of a Variable Length Array In Struct (VLAIS) with a C99
compliant equivalent. This patch allocates the appropriate amount of memory
18 matches
Mail list logo
