On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 04:26:11PM +0200, Luis de Bethencourt wrote:
> Inverting the value of eof is a more direct way of passing to the debugging
> function if eof is false or not.
Really? I like the explicit-ness of the code as it is today, it's more
obvious what is going on, which is the most
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 04:26:11PM +0200, Luis de Bethencourt wrote:
Inverting the value of eof is a more direct way of passing to the debugging
function if eof is false or not.
Really? I like the explicit-ness of the code as it is today, it's more
obvious what is going on, which is the most
Inverting the value of eof is a more direct way of passing to the debugging
function if eof is false or not.
Signed-off-by: Luis de Bethencourt
---
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/mgc/mgc_request.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git
Inverting the value of eof is a more direct way of passing to the debugging
function if eof is false or not.
Signed-off-by: Luis de Bethencourt l...@debethencourt.com
---
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/mgc/mgc_request.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git
4 matches
Mail list logo