Re: [PATCH] target-i386: bugfix of Intel MPX

2014-03-03 Thread Paolo Bonzini
Il 03/03/2014 06:24, Liu, Jinsong ha scritto: From 3a7783cd9a0556787809d3d5ecb5f2b85dd9fc02 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Liu Jinsong Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2014 18:56:39 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] target-i386: bugfix of Intel MPX The correct size of cpuid 0x0d sub-leaf 4 is 0x40, not 0x10

Re: [PATCH] target-i386: bugfix of Intel MPX

2014-03-03 Thread Paolo Bonzini
Il 03/03/2014 06:24, Liu, Jinsong ha scritto: From 3a7783cd9a0556787809d3d5ecb5f2b85dd9fc02 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Liu Jinsong jinsong@intel.com Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2014 18:56:39 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] target-i386: bugfix of Intel MPX The correct size of cpuid 0x0d sub-leaf 4 is 0x40

[PATCH] target-i386: bugfix of Intel MPX

2014-03-02 Thread Liu, Jinsong
>From 3a7783cd9a0556787809d3d5ecb5f2b85dd9fc02 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Liu Jinsong Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2014 18:56:39 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] target-i386: bugfix of Intel MPX The correct size of cpuid 0x0d sub-leaf 4 is 0x40, not 0x10. This is confirmed by Anvin H Peter and Mallick Asi

[PATCH] target-i386: bugfix of Intel MPX

2014-03-02 Thread Liu, Jinsong
From 3a7783cd9a0556787809d3d5ecb5f2b85dd9fc02 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Liu Jinsong jinsong@intel.com Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2014 18:56:39 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] target-i386: bugfix of Intel MPX The correct size of cpuid 0x0d sub-leaf 4 is 0x40, not 0x10. This is confirmed by Anvin H Peter