On Sat, 6 Jan 2018 11:12:46 +0530
Ravi Bangoria wrote:
> Recently, how the pointers being printed with %p has been changed
> by commit ad67b74d2469 ("printk: hash addresses printed with %p").
> This is causing a regression while showing offset in the
>
On Sat, 6 Jan 2018 11:12:46 +0530
Ravi Bangoria wrote:
> Recently, how the pointers being printed with %p has been changed
> by commit ad67b74d2469 ("printk: hash addresses printed with %p").
> This is causing a regression while showing offset in the
> uprobe_events file. Instead of %p, use %px
* Tobin C. Harding [2018-01-08 17:35:59]:
> On Mon, Jan 08, 2018 at 12:01:04PM +0530, Ravi Bangoria wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 01/08/2018 10:49 AM, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
> > > * Ravi Bangoria [2018-01-06 11:12:46]:
> > >
> > >> Recently, how the
* Tobin C. Harding [2018-01-08 17:35:59]:
> On Mon, Jan 08, 2018 at 12:01:04PM +0530, Ravi Bangoria wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 01/08/2018 10:49 AM, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
> > > * Ravi Bangoria [2018-01-06 11:12:46]:
> > >
> > >> Recently, how the pointers being printed with %p has been changed
>
On Mon, Jan 08, 2018 at 12:01:04PM +0530, Ravi Bangoria wrote:
>
>
> On 01/08/2018 10:49 AM, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
> > * Ravi Bangoria [2018-01-06 11:12:46]:
> >
> >> Recently, how the pointers being printed with %p has been changed
> >> by commit
On Mon, Jan 08, 2018 at 12:01:04PM +0530, Ravi Bangoria wrote:
>
>
> On 01/08/2018 10:49 AM, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
> > * Ravi Bangoria [2018-01-06 11:12:46]:
> >
> >> Recently, how the pointers being printed with %p has been changed
> >> by commit ad67b74d2469 ("printk: hash addresses
On 01/08/2018 10:49 AM, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
> * Ravi Bangoria [2018-01-06 11:12:46]:
>
>> Recently, how the pointers being printed with %p has been changed
>> by commit ad67b74d2469 ("printk: hash addresses printed with %p").
>> This is causing a
On 01/08/2018 10:49 AM, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
> * Ravi Bangoria [2018-01-06 11:12:46]:
>
>> Recently, how the pointers being printed with %p has been changed
>> by commit ad67b74d2469 ("printk: hash addresses printed with %p").
>> This is causing a regression while showing offset in the
>>
* Ravi Bangoria [2018-01-06 11:12:46]:
> Recently, how the pointers being printed with %p has been changed
> by commit ad67b74d2469 ("printk: hash addresses printed with %p").
> This is causing a regression while showing offset in the
> uprobe_events file.
* Ravi Bangoria [2018-01-06 11:12:46]:
> Recently, how the pointers being printed with %p has been changed
> by commit ad67b74d2469 ("printk: hash addresses printed with %p").
> This is causing a regression while showing offset in the
> uprobe_events file. Instead of %p, use %px to display
Recently, how the pointers being printed with %p has been changed
by commit ad67b74d2469 ("printk: hash addresses printed with %p").
This is causing a regression while showing offset in the
uprobe_events file. Instead of %p, use %px to display offset.
Before patch:
# perf probe -vv -x
Recently, how the pointers being printed with %p has been changed
by commit ad67b74d2469 ("printk: hash addresses printed with %p").
This is causing a regression while showing offset in the
uprobe_events file. Instead of %p, use %px to display offset.
Before patch:
# perf probe -vv -x
12 matches
Mail list logo