On Tue, Jun 03, 2014 at 03:31:45PM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> There is a piece of sanity checks code in the put_unbound_pool().
> The meaning of this code is "if it is not an unbound pool, it will complain
> and return" IIUC. But the code uses "pool->flags & POOL_DISASSOCIATED"
> imprecisely
On Tue, Jun 03, 2014 at 03:31:45PM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
There is a piece of sanity checks code in the put_unbound_pool().
The meaning of this code is if it is not an unbound pool, it will complain
and return IIUC. But the code uses pool-flags POOL_DISASSOCIATED
imprecisely due to a
Hi, Tejun
3.16-rc1 came out. Could you review the patches?
Thanks,
Lai
On 06/03/2014 03:31 PM, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> There is a piece of sanity checks code in the put_unbound_pool().
> The meaning of this code is "if it is not an unbound pool, it will complain
> and return" IIUC. But the code
Hi, Tejun
3.16-rc1 came out. Could you review the patches?
Thanks,
Lai
On 06/03/2014 03:31 PM, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
There is a piece of sanity checks code in the put_unbound_pool().
The meaning of this code is if it is not an unbound pool, it will complain
and return IIUC. But the code uses
On 06/05/2014 09:17 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 09:20:56AM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
>> And would these patches be possible for 3.16?
>
> It's a bit too late. I'd like to wait for the next merge window.
OK,
> AFAICS, there's nothing critical, right?
They are normal
On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 09:20:56AM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> And would these patches be possible for 3.16?
It's a bit too late. I'd like to wait for the next merge window.
AFAICS, there's nothing critical, right?
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
Ping.
And would these patches be possible for 3.16?
Thanks,
Lai
On 06/03/2014 03:31 PM, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> There is a piece of sanity checks code in the put_unbound_pool().
> The meaning of this code is "if it is not an unbound pool, it will complain
> and return" IIUC. But the code uses
Ping.
And would these patches be possible for 3.16?
Thanks,
Lai
On 06/03/2014 03:31 PM, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
There is a piece of sanity checks code in the put_unbound_pool().
The meaning of this code is if it is not an unbound pool, it will complain
and return IIUC. But the code uses
On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 09:20:56AM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
And would these patches be possible for 3.16?
It's a bit too late. I'd like to wait for the next merge window.
AFAICS, there's nothing critical, right?
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe
On 06/05/2014 09:17 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 09:20:56AM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
And would these patches be possible for 3.16?
It's a bit too late. I'd like to wait for the next merge window.
OK,
AFAICS, there's nothing critical, right?
They are normal cleanups.
There is a piece of sanity checks code in the put_unbound_pool().
The meaning of this code is "if it is not an unbound pool, it will complain
and return" IIUC. But the code uses "pool->flags & POOL_DISASSOCIATED"
imprecisely due to a non-unbound pool may also have this flags.
We should use
There is a piece of sanity checks code in the put_unbound_pool().
The meaning of this code is if it is not an unbound pool, it will complain
and return IIUC. But the code uses pool-flags POOL_DISASSOCIATED
imprecisely due to a non-unbound pool may also have this flags.
We should use pool-cpu 0
12 matches
Mail list logo