Resending ... didn't see this in tree yet and want to make sure it doesn't
get dropped.
Last submit here: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel=139453958911067=2
P.
---8<---
Several patches to fix cpu hotplug and the down'd cpu's irq relocations
have been submitted in the past month or so. The
Resending ... didn't see this in tree yet and want to make sure it doesn't
get dropped.
Last submit here: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernelm=139453958911067w=2
P.
---8---
Several patches to fix cpu hotplug and the down'd cpu's irq relocations
have been submitted in the past month or so. The
Several patches to fix cpu hotplug and the down'd cpu's irq relocations
have been submitted in the past month or so. The patches should resolve
the problems with cpu hotplug and irq relocation, however, there is
always a possibility that a bug still exists. The big problem with
debugging these
* Prarit Bhargava wrote:
> fixup_irqs() calls chip->set_irq_affinity which eventually calls
> __assign_irq_vector(). Errors are not propogated back from this function call
> and this results in silent irq relocation failures. This patch fixes this
> issue and prints out a warning if there is
* Prarit Bhargava pra...@redhat.com wrote:
fixup_irqs() calls chip-set_irq_affinity which eventually calls
__assign_irq_vector(). Errors are not propogated back from this function call
and this results in silent irq relocation failures. This patch fixes this
issue and prints out a warning
Several patches to fix cpu hotplug and the down'd cpu's irq relocations
have been submitted in the past month or so. The patches should resolve
the problems with cpu hotplug and irq relocation, however, there is
always a possibility that a bug still exists. The big problem with
debugging these
fixup_irqs() calls chip->set_irq_affinity which eventually calls
__assign_irq_vector(). Errors are not propogated back from this function call
and this results in silent irq relocation failures. This patch fixes this
issue and prints out a warning if there is a relocation failure.
[v2]:
On Wed, 5 Mar 2014, David Rientjes wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Mar 2014, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
>
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/irq.c b/arch/x86/kernel/irq.c
> > index d99f31d..55fab61 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/irq.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/irq.c
> > @@ -351,6 +351,7 @@ void fixup_irqs(void)
On Wed, 5 Mar 2014, David Rientjes wrote:
On Wed, 5 Mar 2014, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/irq.c b/arch/x86/kernel/irq.c
index d99f31d..55fab61 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/irq.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/irq.c
@@ -351,6 +351,7 @@ void fixup_irqs(void)
fixup_irqs() calls chip-set_irq_affinity which eventually calls
__assign_irq_vector(). Errors are not propogated back from this function call
and this results in silent irq relocation failures. This patch fixes this
issue and prints out a warning if there is a relocation failure.
[v2]: modified
On 03/05/2014 04:09 PM, David Rientjes wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Mar 2014, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/irq.c b/arch/x86/kernel/irq.c
>> index d99f31d..55fab61 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/irq.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/irq.c
>> @@ -351,6 +351,7 @@ void fixup_irqs(void)
On Wed, 5 Mar 2014, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/irq.c b/arch/x86/kernel/irq.c
> index d99f31d..55fab61 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/irq.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/irq.c
> @@ -351,6 +351,7 @@ void fixup_irqs(void)
> struct irq_desc *desc;
> struct irq_data
fixup_irqs() calls chip->set_irq_affinity which eventually calls
__assign_irq_vector(). Errors are not propogated back from this function call
and this results in silent irq relocation failures. This patch fixes this
issue and prints out a warning if there is a relocation failure.
Cc: Thomas
fixup_irqs() calls chip-set_irq_affinity which eventually calls
__assign_irq_vector(). Errors are not propogated back from this function call
and this results in silent irq relocation failures. This patch fixes this
issue and prints out a warning if there is a relocation failure.
Cc: Thomas
On Wed, 5 Mar 2014, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/irq.c b/arch/x86/kernel/irq.c
index d99f31d..55fab61 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/irq.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/irq.c
@@ -351,6 +351,7 @@ void fixup_irqs(void)
struct irq_desc *desc;
struct irq_data *data;
On 03/05/2014 04:09 PM, David Rientjes wrote:
On Wed, 5 Mar 2014, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/irq.c b/arch/x86/kernel/irq.c
index d99f31d..55fab61 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/irq.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/irq.c
@@ -351,6 +351,7 @@ void fixup_irqs(void)
struct
16 matches
Mail list logo