Re: [PATCH] xtime_lock vs update_process_times

2008-02-13 Thread Paul Mundt
On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 09:33:16PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > Subject: xtime_lock vs update_process_times > From: Peter Zijlstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > ( repost from: http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/1/28/101 ) > > Commit: d3d74453c34f8fd87674a8cf5b8a327c68f22e99 > Subject: hrtimer: fixup the

[PATCH] xtime_lock vs update_process_times

2008-02-13 Thread Peter Zijlstra
This time with LKML CC'ed. Sorry for the duplication. Subject: xtime_lock vs update_process_times From: Peter Zijlstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ( repost from: http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/1/28/101 ) Commit: d3d74453c34f8fd87674a8cf5b8a327c68f22e99 Subject: hrtimer: fixup the

[PATCH] xtime_lock vs update_process_times

2008-02-13 Thread Peter Zijlstra
This time with LKML CC'ed. Sorry for the duplication. Subject: xtime_lock vs update_process_times From: Peter Zijlstra [EMAIL PROTECTED] ( repost from: http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/1/28/101 ) Commit: d3d74453c34f8fd87674a8cf5b8a327c68f22e99 Subject: hrtimer: fixup the

Re: [PATCH] xtime_lock vs update_process_times

2008-02-13 Thread Paul Mundt
On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 09:33:16PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: Subject: xtime_lock vs update_process_times From: Peter Zijlstra [EMAIL PROTECTED] ( repost from: http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/1/28/101 ) Commit: d3d74453c34f8fd87674a8cf5b8a327c68f22e99 Subject: hrtimer: fixup the