Re: [PATCH -next] mfd: arizona: Make some symbols static

2021-03-08 Thread Lee Jones
On Wed, 10 Feb 2021, Wei Yongjun wrote: > The sparse tool complains as follows: > > drivers/mfd/arizona-spi.c:28:31: warning: > symbol 'reset_gpios' was not declared. Should it be static? > drivers/mfd/arizona-spi.c:29:31: warning: > symbol 'ldoena_gpios' was not declared. Should it be static?

Re: [PATCH -next] mfd: arizona: Make some symbols static

2021-02-11 Thread Charles Keepax
On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 07:56:26AM +, Wei Yongjun wrote: > The sparse tool complains as follows: > > drivers/mfd/arizona-spi.c:28:31: warning: > symbol 'reset_gpios' was not declared. Should it be static? > drivers/mfd/arizona-spi.c:29:31: warning: > symbol 'ldoena_gpios' was not declared.

Re: [PATCH -next] mfd: arizona: Make some symbols static

2021-02-10 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 2/10/21 8:56 AM, Wei Yongjun wrote: > The sparse tool complains as follows: > > drivers/mfd/arizona-spi.c:28:31: warning: > symbol 'reset_gpios' was not declared. Should it be static? > drivers/mfd/arizona-spi.c:29:31: warning: > symbol 'ldoena_gpios' was not declared. Should it be

[PATCH -next] mfd: arizona: Make some symbols static

2021-02-09 Thread Wei Yongjun
The sparse tool complains as follows: drivers/mfd/arizona-spi.c:28:31: warning: symbol 'reset_gpios' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/mfd/arizona-spi.c:29:31: warning: symbol 'ldoena_gpios' was not declared. Should it be static? Those symbols are not used outside of