Re: [PATCH 0/2] KVM: minor cleanup and optimizations

2014-09-01 Thread Alexander Graf
On 28.08.14 15:13, Radim Krčmář wrote: > The first patch answers a demand for inline arch functions. > (There is a lot of constant functions that could be inlined as well.) > > Second patch digs a bit into the history of KVM and removes a useless > argument that seemed suspicious when preparing

Re: [PATCH 0/2] KVM: minor cleanup and optimizations

2014-09-01 Thread Alexander Graf
On 28.08.14 15:13, Radim Krčmář wrote: The first patch answers a demand for inline arch functions. (There is a lot of constant functions that could be inlined as well.) Second patch digs a bit into the history of KVM and removes a useless argument that seemed suspicious when preparing the

[PATCH 0/2] KVM: minor cleanup and optimizations

2014-08-28 Thread Radim Krčmář
The first patch answers a demand for inline arch functions. (There is a lot of constant functions that could be inlined as well.) Second patch digs a bit into the history of KVM and removes a useless argument that seemed suspicious when preparing the first patch. Radim Krčmář (2): KVM: static

[PATCH 0/2] KVM: minor cleanup and optimizations

2014-08-28 Thread Radim Krčmář
The first patch answers a demand for inline arch functions. (There is a lot of constant functions that could be inlined as well.) Second patch digs a bit into the history of KVM and removes a useless argument that seemed suspicious when preparing the first patch. Radim Krčmář (2): KVM: static