On 28.08.14 15:13, Radim Krčmář wrote:
> The first patch answers a demand for inline arch functions.
> (There is a lot of constant functions that could be inlined as well.)
>
> Second patch digs a bit into the history of KVM and removes a useless
> argument that seemed suspicious when preparing
On 28.08.14 15:13, Radim Krčmář wrote:
The first patch answers a demand for inline arch functions.
(There is a lot of constant functions that could be inlined as well.)
Second patch digs a bit into the history of KVM and removes a useless
argument that seemed suspicious when preparing the
The first patch answers a demand for inline arch functions.
(There is a lot of constant functions that could be inlined as well.)
Second patch digs a bit into the history of KVM and removes a useless
argument that seemed suspicious when preparing the first patch.
Radim Krčmář (2):
KVM: static
The first patch answers a demand for inline arch functions.
(There is a lot of constant functions that could be inlined as well.)
Second patch digs a bit into the history of KVM and removes a useless
argument that seemed suspicious when preparing the first patch.
Radim Krčmář (2):
KVM: static
4 matches
Mail list logo