On 07/11/2014 03:21 PM, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> Hi Tushar,
>
> On 11.07.2014 11:37, Tushar Behera wrote:
>> The patchset is targetted as moving exising exynos-audss clock driver from
>> being
>> a module driver. The driver is now registered through CLK_OF_DECLARE and is
>> inline with other Samsung
Hi Tushar,
On 11.07.2014 11:37, Tushar Behera wrote:
> The patchset is targetted as moving exising exynos-audss clock driver from
> being
> a module driver. The driver is now registered through CLK_OF_DECLARE and is
> inline with other Samsung clock drivers.
I'm afraid I have to NAK this series
The patchset is targetted as moving exising exynos-audss clock driver from being
a module driver. The driver is now registered through CLK_OF_DECLARE and is
inline with other Samsung clock drivers.
The patches are tested on Exynos5800 based Peach-Pi board. More tests are
welcome.
Tushar Behera
The patchset is targetted as moving exising exynos-audss clock driver from being
a module driver. The driver is now registered through CLK_OF_DECLARE and is
inline with other Samsung clock drivers.
The patches are tested on Exynos5800 based Peach-Pi board. More tests are
welcome.
Tushar Behera
Hi Tushar,
On 11.07.2014 11:37, Tushar Behera wrote:
The patchset is targetted as moving exising exynos-audss clock driver from
being
a module driver. The driver is now registered through CLK_OF_DECLARE and is
inline with other Samsung clock drivers.
I'm afraid I have to NAK this series or
On 07/11/2014 03:21 PM, Tomasz Figa wrote:
Hi Tushar,
On 11.07.2014 11:37, Tushar Behera wrote:
The patchset is targetted as moving exising exynos-audss clock driver from
being
a module driver. The driver is now registered through CLK_OF_DECLARE and is
inline with other Samsung clock
6 matches
Mail list logo