On 7/30/20 12:50 AM, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 10:47:16AM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> We may ask Synopsys folks to look at this as well.
>> Vineet, any ideas if we may unify ATOMIC64_INIT() across the architectures?
> I don't think there is any technical difficulty. The
On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 10:51 AM Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 10:47:16AM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> >
> > We may ask Synopsys folks to look at this as well.
> > Vineet, any ideas if we may unify ATOMIC64_INIT() across the architectures?
>
> I don't think there is any technical
On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 10:47:16AM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>
> We may ask Synopsys folks to look at this as well.
> Vineet, any ideas if we may unify ATOMIC64_INIT() across the architectures?
I don't think there is any technical difficulty. The custom
atomic64_t simply adds an alignment
On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 4:00 AM Herbert Xu wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 06:04:57PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 4:35 PM Waiman Long wrote:
> > > On 7/29/20 8:28 AM, Herbert Xu wrote:
> >
> > ...
> >
> > > This patch series looks good to me. I just wonder if we
On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 06:04:57PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 4:35 PM Waiman Long wrote:
> > On 7/29/20 8:28 AM, Herbert Xu wrote:
>
> ...
>
> > This patch series looks good to me. I just wonder if we should also move
> > ATOMIC64_INIT() to types.h for symmetry
On (20/07/29 22:28), Herbert Xu wrote:
> This miniseries breaks a header loop involving qspinlock_types.h.
> The issue is that qspinlock_types.h includes atomic.h, which then
> eventually includes kernel.h which could lead back to the original
> file via spinlock_types.h.
>
> The first patch
On (20/07/29 16:28), pet...@infradead.org wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 10:28:49PM +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> > On (20/07/29 15:00), pet...@infradead.org wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 10:51:44PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 02:47:44PM +0200,
On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 4:35 PM Waiman Long wrote:
> On 7/29/20 8:28 AM, Herbert Xu wrote:
...
> This patch series looks good to me. I just wonder if we should also move
> ATOMIC64_INIT() to types.h for symmetry purpose. Anyway,
Same question here.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 10:28:49PM +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> On (20/07/29 15:00), pet...@infradead.org wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 10:51:44PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 02:47:44PM +0200, pet...@infradead.org wrote:
> > > >
> [..]
> > > > Anyway, the
On 7/29/20 8:28 AM, Herbert Xu wrote:
This miniseries breaks a header loop involving qspinlock_types.h.
The issue is that qspinlock_types.h includes atomic.h, which then
eventually includes kernel.h which could lead back to the original
file via spinlock_types.h.
The first patch moves
On (20/07/29 15:00), pet...@infradead.org wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 10:51:44PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 02:47:44PM +0200, pet...@infradead.org wrote:
> > >
[..]
> > > Anyway, the patches look sane enough, I'll go stick them in
> > > tip/locking/core or somesuch.
On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 10:51:44PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 02:47:44PM +0200, pet...@infradead.org wrote:
> >
> > How did you run into this, I haven't seen any build failures due to
> > this.
>
> I didn't, Stephen ran into it after merging the printk tree together
> with
On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 02:47:44PM +0200, pet...@infradead.org wrote:
>
> How did you run into this, I haven't seen any build failures due to
> this.
I didn't, Stephen ran into it after merging the printk tree together
with the powerpc tree:
On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 10:28:07PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> This miniseries breaks a header loop involving qspinlock_types.h.
> The issue is that qspinlock_types.h includes atomic.h, which then
> eventually includes kernel.h which could lead back to the original
> file via spinlock_types.h.
How
This miniseries breaks a header loop involving qspinlock_types.h.
The issue is that qspinlock_types.h includes atomic.h, which then
eventually includes kernel.h which could lead back to the original
file via spinlock_types.h.
The first patch moves ATOMIC_INIT into linux/types.h while the second
15 matches
Mail list logo
