Re: [PATCH 0/3] HID: multitouch cleanups and support for fancy devices

2014-03-05 Thread Jiri Kosina
On Fri, 28 Feb 2014, Benjamin Tissoires wrote: > - the first patch is mainly a way for us to reduce the work load regarding > hid-mt > when device makers ask for an inclusion in the kernel. > Also, I have been notified that a Quanta 3008 was not working, and it occurs > that this

Re: [PATCH 0/3] HID: multitouch cleanups and support for fancy devices

2014-03-05 Thread Jiri Kosina
On Fri, 28 Feb 2014, Benjamin Tissoires wrote: - the first patch is mainly a way for us to reduce the work load regarding hid-mt when device makers ask for an inclusion in the kernel. Also, I have been notified that a Quanta 3008 was not working, and it occurs that this particular

[PATCH 0/3] HID: multitouch cleanups and support for fancy devices

2014-02-28 Thread Benjamin Tissoires
Hi guys, Ok, this patch series is not very consistent and could have been split in two... Anyway, here is some work for hid-multitouch: - the first patch is mainly a way for us to reduce the work load regarding hid-mt when device makers ask for an inclusion in the kernel. Also, I have been

[PATCH 0/3] HID: multitouch cleanups and support for fancy devices

2014-02-28 Thread Benjamin Tissoires
Hi guys, Ok, this patch series is not very consistent and could have been split in two... Anyway, here is some work for hid-multitouch: - the first patch is mainly a way for us to reduce the work load regarding hid-mt when device makers ask for an inclusion in the kernel. Also, I have been