Em Wed, 5 Jul 2017 14:22:35 -0700
Jim Davis escreveu:
> On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 5:44 AM, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> > On Mon, 3 Jul 2017 10:25:38 +0200
> > Daniel Vetter wrote:
> >
> >> Only now stumbled over the full thread, but the drm
Em Wed, 5 Jul 2017 14:22:35 -0700
Jim Davis escreveu:
> On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 5:44 AM, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> > On Mon, 3 Jul 2017 10:25:38 +0200
> > Daniel Vetter wrote:
> >
> >> Only now stumbled over the full thread, but the drm patch is already
> >> queued up for at least 4.13 (Dave
> Am 05.07.2017 um 23:22 schrieb Jim Davis :
>
> On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 5:44 AM, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
>> On Mon, 3 Jul 2017 10:25:38 +0200
>> Daniel Vetter wrote:
>>
>>> Only now stumbled over the full thread, but the drm patch is
> Am 05.07.2017 um 23:22 schrieb Jim Davis :
>
> On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 5:44 AM, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
>> On Mon, 3 Jul 2017 10:25:38 +0200
>> Daniel Vetter wrote:
>>
>>> Only now stumbled over the full thread, but the drm patch is already
>>> queued up for at least 4.13 (Dave was out and
On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 5:44 AM, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> On Mon, 3 Jul 2017 10:25:38 +0200
> Daniel Vetter wrote:
>
>> Only now stumbled over the full thread, but the drm patch is already
>> queued up for at least 4.13 (Dave was out and all that). I guess we
On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 5:44 AM, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> On Mon, 3 Jul 2017 10:25:38 +0200
> Daniel Vetter wrote:
>
>> Only now stumbled over the full thread, but the drm patch is already
>> queued up for at least 4.13 (Dave was out and all that). I guess we could
>> try to cherry-pick through
On 07/03/17 01:25, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 18, 2017 at 05:46:25PM -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
>> I've just spent rather more time than I would like figuring out why the PDF
>> builds fail and what was needed to fix it. The result is the following
>> patch series. It's a combination
On 07/03/17 01:25, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 18, 2017 at 05:46:25PM -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
>> I've just spent rather more time than I would like figuring out why the PDF
>> builds fail and what was needed to fix it. The result is the following
>> patch series. It's a combination
On Mon, 3 Jul 2017 10:25:38 +0200
Daniel Vetter wrote:
> Only now stumbled over the full thread, but the drm patch is already
> queued up for at least 4.13 (Dave was out and all that). I guess we could
> try to cherry-pick through stable.
I kind of gave up on the 4.12 goal, at
On Mon, 3 Jul 2017 10:25:38 +0200
Daniel Vetter wrote:
> Only now stumbled over the full thread, but the drm patch is already
> queued up for at least 4.13 (Dave was out and all that). I guess we could
> try to cherry-pick through stable.
I kind of gave up on the 4.12 goal, at least for now.
On Sun, Jun 18, 2017 at 05:46:25PM -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> I've just spent rather more time than I would like figuring out why the PDF
> builds fail and what was needed to fix it. The result is the following
> patch series. It's a combination of little mistakes and fragility in the
>
On Sun, Jun 18, 2017 at 05:46:25PM -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> I've just spent rather more time than I would like figuring out why the PDF
> builds fail and what was needed to fix it. The result is the following
> patch series. It's a combination of little mistakes and fragility in the
>
Em Sun, 18 Jun 2017 22:18:29 -0300
Mauro Carvalho Chehab escreveu:
> Hi Jon,
>
> Em Sun, 18 Jun 2017 17:46:25 -0600
> Jonathan Corbet escreveu:
>
> > I've just spent rather more time than I would like figuring out why the PDF
> > builds fail and what
Em Sun, 18 Jun 2017 22:18:29 -0300
Mauro Carvalho Chehab escreveu:
> Hi Jon,
>
> Em Sun, 18 Jun 2017 17:46:25 -0600
> Jonathan Corbet escreveu:
>
> > I've just spent rather more time than I would like figuring out why the PDF
> > builds fail and what was needed to fix it. The result is the
Hi Jon,
Em Sun, 18 Jun 2017 17:46:25 -0600
Jonathan Corbet escreveu:
> I've just spent rather more time than I would like figuring out why the PDF
> builds fail and what was needed to fix it. The result is the following
> patch series. It's a combination of little mistakes and
Hi Jon,
Em Sun, 18 Jun 2017 17:46:25 -0600
Jonathan Corbet escreveu:
> I've just spent rather more time than I would like figuring out why the PDF
> builds fail and what was needed to fix it. The result is the following
> patch series. It's a combination of little mistakes and fragility in
On Sun, 18 Jun 2017 17:46:25 -0600
Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> In general, I'm dismayed by the fragility of the whole thing. I'm also a
> little concerned that nobody except Jim complained about the problem.
Jim, I just realized I neglected Reported-by tags for you on these
On Sun, 18 Jun 2017 17:46:25 -0600
Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> In general, I'm dismayed by the fragility of the whole thing. I'm also a
> little concerned that nobody except Jim complained about the problem.
Jim, I just realized I neglected Reported-by tags for you on these
patches; I'll fix that
I've just spent rather more time than I would like figuring out why the PDF
builds fail and what was needed to fix it. The result is the following
patch series. It's a combination of little mistakes and fragility in the
whole PDF build tool chain.
Mauro, Daniel: Do you want the last two? Or
I've just spent rather more time than I would like figuring out why the PDF
builds fail and what was needed to fix it. The result is the following
patch series. It's a combination of little mistakes and fragility in the
whole PDF build tool chain.
Mauro, Daniel: Do you want the last two? Or
20 matches
Mail list logo