Re: [PATCH 0/5] Make PDF builds work again

2017-07-06 Thread Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Em Wed, 5 Jul 2017 14:22:35 -0700 Jim Davis escreveu: > On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 5:44 AM, Jonathan Corbet wrote: > > On Mon, 3 Jul 2017 10:25:38 +0200 > > Daniel Vetter wrote: > > > >> Only now stumbled over the full thread, but the drm

Re: [PATCH 0/5] Make PDF builds work again

2017-07-06 Thread Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Em Wed, 5 Jul 2017 14:22:35 -0700 Jim Davis escreveu: > On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 5:44 AM, Jonathan Corbet wrote: > > On Mon, 3 Jul 2017 10:25:38 +0200 > > Daniel Vetter wrote: > > > >> Only now stumbled over the full thread, but the drm patch is already > >> queued up for at least 4.13 (Dave

Re: [PATCH 0/5] Make PDF builds work again

2017-07-06 Thread Markus Heiser
> Am 05.07.2017 um 23:22 schrieb Jim Davis : > > On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 5:44 AM, Jonathan Corbet wrote: >> On Mon, 3 Jul 2017 10:25:38 +0200 >> Daniel Vetter wrote: >> >>> Only now stumbled over the full thread, but the drm patch is

Re: [PATCH 0/5] Make PDF builds work again

2017-07-06 Thread Markus Heiser
> Am 05.07.2017 um 23:22 schrieb Jim Davis : > > On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 5:44 AM, Jonathan Corbet wrote: >> On Mon, 3 Jul 2017 10:25:38 +0200 >> Daniel Vetter wrote: >> >>> Only now stumbled over the full thread, but the drm patch is already >>> queued up for at least 4.13 (Dave was out and

Re: [PATCH 0/5] Make PDF builds work again

2017-07-05 Thread Jim Davis
On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 5:44 AM, Jonathan Corbet wrote: > On Mon, 3 Jul 2017 10:25:38 +0200 > Daniel Vetter wrote: > >> Only now stumbled over the full thread, but the drm patch is already >> queued up for at least 4.13 (Dave was out and all that). I guess we

Re: [PATCH 0/5] Make PDF builds work again

2017-07-05 Thread Jim Davis
On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 5:44 AM, Jonathan Corbet wrote: > On Mon, 3 Jul 2017 10:25:38 +0200 > Daniel Vetter wrote: > >> Only now stumbled over the full thread, but the drm patch is already >> queued up for at least 4.13 (Dave was out and all that). I guess we could >> try to cherry-pick through

Re: [PATCH 0/5] Make PDF builds work again

2017-07-05 Thread Frank Rowand
On 07/03/17 01:25, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Sun, Jun 18, 2017 at 05:46:25PM -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote: >> I've just spent rather more time than I would like figuring out why the PDF >> builds fail and what was needed to fix it. The result is the following >> patch series. It's a combination

Re: [PATCH 0/5] Make PDF builds work again

2017-07-05 Thread Frank Rowand
On 07/03/17 01:25, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Sun, Jun 18, 2017 at 05:46:25PM -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote: >> I've just spent rather more time than I would like figuring out why the PDF >> builds fail and what was needed to fix it. The result is the following >> patch series. It's a combination

Re: [PATCH 0/5] Make PDF builds work again

2017-07-03 Thread Jonathan Corbet
On Mon, 3 Jul 2017 10:25:38 +0200 Daniel Vetter wrote: > Only now stumbled over the full thread, but the drm patch is already > queued up for at least 4.13 (Dave was out and all that). I guess we could > try to cherry-pick through stable. I kind of gave up on the 4.12 goal, at

Re: [PATCH 0/5] Make PDF builds work again

2017-07-03 Thread Jonathan Corbet
On Mon, 3 Jul 2017 10:25:38 +0200 Daniel Vetter wrote: > Only now stumbled over the full thread, but the drm patch is already > queued up for at least 4.13 (Dave was out and all that). I guess we could > try to cherry-pick through stable. I kind of gave up on the 4.12 goal, at least for now.

Re: [PATCH 0/5] Make PDF builds work again

2017-07-03 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Sun, Jun 18, 2017 at 05:46:25PM -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote: > I've just spent rather more time than I would like figuring out why the PDF > builds fail and what was needed to fix it. The result is the following > patch series. It's a combination of little mistakes and fragility in the >

Re: [PATCH 0/5] Make PDF builds work again

2017-07-03 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Sun, Jun 18, 2017 at 05:46:25PM -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote: > I've just spent rather more time than I would like figuring out why the PDF > builds fail and what was needed to fix it. The result is the following > patch series. It's a combination of little mistakes and fragility in the >

Re: [PATCH 0/5] Make PDF builds work again

2017-06-19 Thread Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Em Sun, 18 Jun 2017 22:18:29 -0300 Mauro Carvalho Chehab escreveu: > Hi Jon, > > Em Sun, 18 Jun 2017 17:46:25 -0600 > Jonathan Corbet escreveu: > > > I've just spent rather more time than I would like figuring out why the PDF > > builds fail and what

Re: [PATCH 0/5] Make PDF builds work again

2017-06-19 Thread Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Em Sun, 18 Jun 2017 22:18:29 -0300 Mauro Carvalho Chehab escreveu: > Hi Jon, > > Em Sun, 18 Jun 2017 17:46:25 -0600 > Jonathan Corbet escreveu: > > > I've just spent rather more time than I would like figuring out why the PDF > > builds fail and what was needed to fix it. The result is the

Re: [PATCH 0/5] Make PDF builds work again

2017-06-18 Thread Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Hi Jon, Em Sun, 18 Jun 2017 17:46:25 -0600 Jonathan Corbet escreveu: > I've just spent rather more time than I would like figuring out why the PDF > builds fail and what was needed to fix it. The result is the following > patch series. It's a combination of little mistakes and

Re: [PATCH 0/5] Make PDF builds work again

2017-06-18 Thread Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Hi Jon, Em Sun, 18 Jun 2017 17:46:25 -0600 Jonathan Corbet escreveu: > I've just spent rather more time than I would like figuring out why the PDF > builds fail and what was needed to fix it. The result is the following > patch series. It's a combination of little mistakes and fragility in

Re: [PATCH 0/5] Make PDF builds work again

2017-06-18 Thread Jonathan Corbet
On Sun, 18 Jun 2017 17:46:25 -0600 Jonathan Corbet wrote: > In general, I'm dismayed by the fragility of the whole thing. I'm also a > little concerned that nobody except Jim complained about the problem. Jim, I just realized I neglected Reported-by tags for you on these

Re: [PATCH 0/5] Make PDF builds work again

2017-06-18 Thread Jonathan Corbet
On Sun, 18 Jun 2017 17:46:25 -0600 Jonathan Corbet wrote: > In general, I'm dismayed by the fragility of the whole thing. I'm also a > little concerned that nobody except Jim complained about the problem. Jim, I just realized I neglected Reported-by tags for you on these patches; I'll fix that

[PATCH 0/5] Make PDF builds work again

2017-06-18 Thread Jonathan Corbet
I've just spent rather more time than I would like figuring out why the PDF builds fail and what was needed to fix it. The result is the following patch series. It's a combination of little mistakes and fragility in the whole PDF build tool chain. Mauro, Daniel: Do you want the last two? Or

[PATCH 0/5] Make PDF builds work again

2017-06-18 Thread Jonathan Corbet
I've just spent rather more time than I would like figuring out why the PDF builds fail and what was needed to fix it. The result is the following patch series. It's a combination of little mistakes and fragility in the whole PDF build tool chain. Mauro, Daniel: Do you want the last two? Or