Hi Guenter,
https://github.com/pantoniou/linux-beagle-track-mainline
Against tip of the mainline, topic branches against the master,
and a merge-branch every time I do one.
Regards
-- Pantelis
On Jun 29, 2013, at 5:38 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 09:31:04PM +0200,
Hi Guenter,
https://github.com/pantoniou/linux-beagle-track-mainline
Against tip of the mainline, topic branches against the master,
and a merge-branch every time I do one.
Regards
-- Pantelis
On Jun 29, 2013, at 5:38 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 09:31:04PM +0200,
On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 12:46:24PM +0300, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
> Hi Guenter,
>
> Yes there is an updated patchset against 3.10 as of this morning.
>
> I will post details how to get it later today.
>
Hi Pantelis,
looking forward to it. I see you have a large number of new branches in your
Hi Guenter,
Yes there is an updated patchset against 3.10 as of this morning.
I will post details how to get it later today.
Regards
-- Pantelis
On Jun 29, 2013, at 5:38 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 09:31:04PM +0200, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
>> The following patchset
Hi Guenter,
Yes there is an updated patchset against 3.10 as of this morning.
I will post details how to get it later today.
Regards
-- Pantelis
On Jun 29, 2013, at 5:38 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 09:31:04PM +0200, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
The following patchset
On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 12:46:24PM +0300, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
Hi Guenter,
Yes there is an updated patchset against 3.10 as of this morning.
I will post details how to get it later today.
Hi Pantelis,
looking forward to it. I see you have a large number of new branches in your
On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 09:31:04PM +0200, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
> The following patchset introduces Device Tree overlays, a method
> of dynamically altering the kernel's live Device Tree.
>
> This patchset is against mainline as of Friday Jan 4 2013.
> (4956964 Merge tag 'driver-core-3.8-rc2'
On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 09:31:04PM +0200, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
The following patchset introduces Device Tree overlays, a method
of dynamically altering the kernel's live Device Tree.
This patchset is against mainline as of Friday Jan 4 2013.
(4956964 Merge tag 'driver-core-3.8-rc2' of \
Our use case is partial reconfiguration of the FPGA. This will be
driven from userspace, so the bitstream to program the FPGA will come
from userspace, then the overlay for the DT, also from userspace.
So we want to take a compiled partial device tree and simply 'cat' it
to a point under /proc,
Our use case is partial reconfiguration of the FPGA. This will be
driven from userspace, so the bitstream to program the FPGA will come
from userspace, then the overlay for the DT, also from userspace.
So we want to take a compiled partial device tree and simply 'cat' it
to a point under /proc,
Hi Alan,
On Feb 21, 2013, at 1:25 PM, delicious quinoa wrote:
> I like where this is heading. I'm interested in a use case where IP
> can be loaded into a FPGA, then add a blob to the device tree and load
> some drivers.
>
> I see your github tree. If I wanted to cherry-pick your code and
I like where this is heading. I'm interested in a use case where IP
can be loaded into a FPGA, then add a blob to the device tree and load
some drivers.
I see your github tree. If I wanted to cherry-pick your code and play
around with it, which branch should I use? not-capebus-21?
Thanks,
I like where this is heading. I'm interested in a use case where IP
can be loaded into a FPGA, then add a blob to the device tree and load
some drivers.
I see your github tree. If I wanted to cherry-pick your code and play
around with it, which branch should I use? not-capebus-21?
Thanks,
Hi Alan,
On Feb 21, 2013, at 1:25 PM, delicious quinoa wrote:
I like where this is heading. I'm interested in a use case where IP
can be loaded into a FPGA, then add a blob to the device tree and load
some drivers.
I see your github tree. If I wanted to cherry-pick your code and play
On 01/05/2013 03:35:58 AM, Richard Cochran wrote:
On Sat, Jan 05, 2013 at 12:16:51AM -0600, Joel A Fernandes wrote:
>
> The problem being addressed is discussed in this thread:
> http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1389017
Thanks for the link.
Since the motivation is already
Hi Richard,
It should, but there are a few differences in the syntax plus the fact that I
didn't write it.
It should go in by a separate patch by the original author.
Regards
-- Pantelis
Από το iPad μου
5 Ιαν 2013, 11:35 π.μ., ο/η Richard Cochran έγραψε:
> On Sat, Jan 05, 2013 at
On Sat, Jan 05, 2013 at 12:16:51AM -0600, Joel A Fernandes wrote:
>
> The problem being addressed is discussed in this thread:
> http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1389017
Thanks for the link.
Since the motivation is already documented in that post, why not add
it into
On Sat, Jan 05, 2013 at 12:16:51AM -0600, Joel A Fernandes wrote:
The problem being addressed is discussed in this thread:
http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1389017
Thanks for the link.
Since the motivation is already documented in that post, why not add
it into
Hi Richard,
It should, but there are a few differences in the syntax plus the fact that I
didn't write it.
It should go in by a separate patch by the original author.
Regards
-- Pantelis
Από το iPad μου
5 Ιαν 2013, 11:35 π.μ., ο/η Richard Cochran richardcoch...@gmail.com έγραψε:
On Sat,
On 01/05/2013 03:35:58 AM, Richard Cochran wrote:
On Sat, Jan 05, 2013 at 12:16:51AM -0600, Joel A Fernandes wrote:
The problem being addressed is discussed in this thread:
http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1389017
Thanks for the link.
Since the motivation is already documented
Hi Richard,
On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 9:35 PM, Richard Cochran
wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 09:31:04PM +0200, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
>> The following patchset introduces Device Tree overlays, a method
>> of dynamically altering the kernel's live Device Tree.
>
> It would be nice to know the
On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 09:31:04PM +0200, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
> The following patchset introduces Device Tree overlays, a method
> of dynamically altering the kernel's live Device Tree.
It would be nice to know the motivation for this code.
What is the use case? What problem or issue is
The following patchset introduces Device Tree overlays, a method
of dynamically altering the kernel's live Device Tree.
This patchset is against mainline as of Friday Jan 4 2013.
(4956964 Merge tag 'driver-core-3.8-rc2' of \
The following patchset introduces Device Tree overlays, a method
of dynamically altering the kernel's live Device Tree.
This patchset is against mainline as of Friday Jan 4 2013.
(4956964 Merge tag 'driver-core-3.8-rc2' of \
On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 09:31:04PM +0200, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
The following patchset introduces Device Tree overlays, a method
of dynamically altering the kernel's live Device Tree.
It would be nice to know the motivation for this code.
What is the use case? What problem or issue is being
Hi Richard,
On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 9:35 PM, Richard Cochran
richardcoch...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 09:31:04PM +0200, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
The following patchset introduces Device Tree overlays, a method
of dynamically altering the kernel's live Device Tree.
It would be
26 matches
Mail list logo
