RE: [PATCH 0/7] perf tools: Clarify overwrite and backward, bugfix

2017-11-13 Thread Liang, Kan
> Based on previous discussion, perf needs to support only two types > of ringbuffer: read-write + forward, readonly + backward. This patchset > completly removes the concept of 'overwrite' from code level, controls > mapping permission using write_backward instead. I think I suggested to remove

RE: [PATCH 0/7] perf tools: Clarify overwrite and backward, bugfix

2017-11-13 Thread Liang, Kan
> Based on previous discussion, perf needs to support only two types > of ringbuffer: read-write + forward, readonly + backward. This patchset > completly removes the concept of 'overwrite' from code level, controls > mapping permission using write_backward instead. I think I suggested to remove

[PATCH 0/7] perf tools: Clarify overwrite and backward, bugfix

2017-11-12 Thread Wang Nan
Based on previous discussion, perf needs to support only two types of ringbuffer: read-write + forward, readonly + backward. This patchset completly removes the concept of 'overwrite' from code level, controls mapping permission using write_backward instead. Wang Nan (7): perf mmap: Fix perf

[PATCH 0/7] perf tools: Clarify overwrite and backward, bugfix

2017-11-12 Thread Wang Nan
Based on previous discussion, perf needs to support only two types of ringbuffer: read-write + forward, readonly + backward. This patchset completly removes the concept of 'overwrite' from code level, controls mapping permission using write_backward instead. Wang Nan (7): perf mmap: Fix perf