Re: [PATCH 00/11] Sync and VFS scalability improvements

2013-08-01 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 8:19 AM, Dave Chinner wrote: > On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 08:48:40AM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 6:15 AM, Dave Chinner wrote: >> > Hi folks, >> > >> > This series of patches is against the curent mmotm tree here: >> > >> >

Re: [PATCH 00/11] Sync and VFS scalability improvements

2013-08-01 Thread Dave Chinner
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 08:48:40AM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 6:15 AM, Dave Chinner wrote: > > Hi folks, > > > > This series of patches is against the curent mmotm tree here: > > > > http://git.cmpxchg.org/cgit/linux-mmotm.git/ > > > > "Current" is not precise enough...

Re: [PATCH 00/11] Sync and VFS scalability improvements

2013-08-01 Thread Dave Chinner
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 08:48:40AM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 6:15 AM, Dave Chinner da...@fromorbit.com wrote: Hi folks, This series of patches is against the curent mmotm tree here: http://git.cmpxchg.org/cgit/linux-mmotm.git/ Current is not precise

Re: [PATCH 00/11] Sync and VFS scalability improvements

2013-08-01 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 8:19 AM, Dave Chinner da...@fromorbit.com wrote: On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 08:48:40AM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 6:15 AM, Dave Chinner da...@fromorbit.com wrote: Hi folks, This series of patches is against the curent mmotm tree here:

Re: [PATCH 00/11] Sync and VFS scalability improvements

2013-07-31 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 6:15 AM, Dave Chinner wrote: > Hi folks, > > This series of patches is against the curent mmotm tree here: > > http://git.cmpxchg.org/cgit/linux-mmotm.git/ > "Current" is not precise enough... above tree has git-tags. I guess you mean "v3.11-rc1-mmotm-2013-07-18-16-40" ?

Re: [PATCH 00/11] Sync and VFS scalability improvements

2013-07-31 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 6:15 AM, Dave Chinner da...@fromorbit.com wrote: Hi folks, This series of patches is against the curent mmotm tree here: http://git.cmpxchg.org/cgit/linux-mmotm.git/ Current is not precise enough... above tree has git-tags. I guess you mean

[PATCH 00/11] Sync and VFS scalability improvements

2013-07-30 Thread Dave Chinner
Hi folks, This series of patches is against the curent mmotm tree here: http://git.cmpxchg.org/cgit/linux-mmotm.git/ It addresses several VFS scalability issues, the most pressing of which is lock contention triggered by concurrent sync(2) calls. The patches in the series are: writeback: plug

[PATCH 00/11] Sync and VFS scalability improvements

2013-07-30 Thread Dave Chinner
Hi folks, This series of patches is against the curent mmotm tree here: http://git.cmpxchg.org/cgit/linux-mmotm.git/ It addresses several VFS scalability issues, the most pressing of which is lock contention triggered by concurrent sync(2) calls. The patches in the series are: writeback: plug