Re: [PATCH 00/46] Automatic NUMA Balancing V4

2012-11-22 Thread Mel Gorman
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 10:05:14AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > Thanks! > > > > I ran a quick test with your 'balancenuma v4' tree and while > > numa02 and numa01-THREAD-ALLOC performance is looking good, > > numa01 performance does not look very good: > > > > mainline

Re: [PATCH 00/46] Automatic NUMA Balancing V4

2012-11-22 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Mel Gorman wrote: > > I did a quick SPECjbb 32-warehouses run as well: > > > > numa/core balancenuma-v4 > > SPECjbb +THP: 655 k/sec 607 k/sec > > > > Cool. Lets see what we have here. I have some questions; > > You say you ran

Re: [PATCH 00/46] Automatic NUMA Balancing V4

2012-11-22 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Mel Gorman wrote: > > > On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 06:03:06PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > > > * Mel Gorman wrote: > > > > > > > On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 10:21:06AM +, Mel Gorman wrote: > > > > > > > > > > I am not including a benchmark report in this but

Re: [PATCH 00/46] Automatic NUMA Balancing V4

2012-11-22 Thread Mel Gorman
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 12:27:15AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Mel Gorman wrote: > > > > I did a quick SPECjbb 32-warehouses run as well: > > > > > > numa/core balancenuma-v4 > > > SPECjbb +THP: 655 k/sec 607 k/sec > > > > >

Re: [PATCH 00/46] Automatic NUMA Balancing V4

2012-11-22 Thread Mel Gorman
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 12:27:15AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: * Mel Gorman mgor...@suse.de wrote: I did a quick SPECjbb 32-warehouses run as well: numa/core balancenuma-v4 SPECjbb +THP: 655 k/sec 607 k/sec

Re: [PATCH 00/46] Automatic NUMA Balancing V4

2012-11-22 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Ingo Molnar mi...@kernel.org wrote: * Mel Gorman mgor...@suse.de wrote: On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 06:03:06PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: * Mel Gorman mgor...@suse.de wrote: On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 10:21:06AM +, Mel Gorman wrote: I am not including a benchmark

Re: [PATCH 00/46] Automatic NUMA Balancing V4

2012-11-22 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Mel Gorman mgor...@suse.de wrote: I did a quick SPECjbb 32-warehouses run as well: numa/core balancenuma-v4 SPECjbb +THP: 655 k/sec 607 k/sec Cool. Lets see what we have here. I have some questions; You say you

Re: [PATCH 00/46] Automatic NUMA Balancing V4

2012-11-22 Thread Mel Gorman
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 10:05:14AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: Thanks! I ran a quick test with your 'balancenuma v4' tree and while numa02 and numa01-THREAD-ALLOC performance is looking good, numa01 performance does not look very good: mainlinenuma/core

Re: [PATCH 00/46] Automatic NUMA Balancing V4

2012-11-21 Thread Mel Gorman
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 07:21:58PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Mel Gorman wrote: > > > On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 06:33:16PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > > > * Mel Gorman wrote: > > > > > > > On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 06:03:06PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > > > > > > > * Mel Gorman

Re: [PATCH 00/46] Automatic NUMA Balancing V4

2012-11-21 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Mel Gorman wrote: > On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 06:33:16PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > * Mel Gorman wrote: > > > > > On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 06:03:06PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > > > > > * Mel Gorman wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 10:21:06AM +, Mel Gorman

Re: [PATCH 00/46] Automatic NUMA Balancing V4

2012-11-21 Thread Mel Gorman
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 06:33:16PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Mel Gorman wrote: > > > On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 06:03:06PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > > > * Mel Gorman wrote: > > > > > > > On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 10:21:06AM +, Mel Gorman wrote: > > > > > > > > > > I am not

Re: [PATCH 00/46] Automatic NUMA Balancing V4

2012-11-21 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Mel Gorman wrote: > On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 06:03:06PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > * Mel Gorman wrote: > > > > > On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 10:21:06AM +, Mel Gorman wrote: > > > > > > > > I am not including a benchmark report in this but will be posting one > > > > shortly in the

Re: [PATCH 00/46] Automatic NUMA Balancing V4

2012-11-21 Thread Mel Gorman
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 06:03:06PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Mel Gorman wrote: > > > On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 10:21:06AM +, Mel Gorman wrote: > > > > > > I am not including a benchmark report in this but will be posting one > > > shortly in the "Latest numa/core release, v16" thread

Re: [PATCH 00/46] Automatic NUMA Balancing V4

2012-11-21 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Mel Gorman wrote: > On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 10:21:06AM +, Mel Gorman wrote: > > > > I am not including a benchmark report in this but will be posting one > > shortly in the "Latest numa/core release, v16" thread along with the latest > > schednuma figures I have available. > > > >

Re: [PATCH 00/46] Automatic NUMA Balancing V4

2012-11-21 Thread Mel Gorman
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 10:21:06AM +, Mel Gorman wrote: > > I am not including a benchmark report in this but will be posting one > shortly in the "Latest numa/core release, v16" thread along with the latest > schednuma figures I have available. > Report is linked here

[PATCH 00/46] Automatic NUMA Balancing V4

2012-11-21 Thread Mel Gorman
tldr: Benchmarkers, only test patches 1-37. If there is instability, it may be due to the native THP migration patch and test with 1-36. Please report any results or problems you find. In terms of merging, I would also only consider patches 1-37. git tree:

[PATCH 00/46] Automatic NUMA Balancing V4

2012-11-21 Thread Mel Gorman
tldr: Benchmarkers, only test patches 1-37. If there is instability, it may be due to the native THP migration patch and test with 1-36. Please report any results or problems you find. In terms of merging, I would also only consider patches 1-37. git tree:

Re: [PATCH 00/46] Automatic NUMA Balancing V4

2012-11-21 Thread Mel Gorman
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 10:21:06AM +, Mel Gorman wrote: I am not including a benchmark report in this but will be posting one shortly in the Latest numa/core release, v16 thread along with the latest schednuma figures I have available. Report is linked here

Re: [PATCH 00/46] Automatic NUMA Balancing V4

2012-11-21 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Mel Gorman mgor...@suse.de wrote: On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 10:21:06AM +, Mel Gorman wrote: I am not including a benchmark report in this but will be posting one shortly in the Latest numa/core release, v16 thread along with the latest schednuma figures I have available.

Re: [PATCH 00/46] Automatic NUMA Balancing V4

2012-11-21 Thread Mel Gorman
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 06:03:06PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: * Mel Gorman mgor...@suse.de wrote: On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 10:21:06AM +, Mel Gorman wrote: I am not including a benchmark report in this but will be posting one shortly in the Latest numa/core release, v16 thread

Re: [PATCH 00/46] Automatic NUMA Balancing V4

2012-11-21 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Mel Gorman mgor...@suse.de wrote: On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 06:03:06PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: * Mel Gorman mgor...@suse.de wrote: On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 10:21:06AM +, Mel Gorman wrote: I am not including a benchmark report in this but will be posting one shortly

Re: [PATCH 00/46] Automatic NUMA Balancing V4

2012-11-21 Thread Mel Gorman
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 06:33:16PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: * Mel Gorman mgor...@suse.de wrote: On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 06:03:06PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: * Mel Gorman mgor...@suse.de wrote: On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 10:21:06AM +, Mel Gorman wrote: I am not

Re: [PATCH 00/46] Automatic NUMA Balancing V4

2012-11-21 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Mel Gorman mgor...@suse.de wrote: On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 06:33:16PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: * Mel Gorman mgor...@suse.de wrote: On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 06:03:06PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: * Mel Gorman mgor...@suse.de wrote: On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 10:21:06AM

Re: [PATCH 00/46] Automatic NUMA Balancing V4

2012-11-21 Thread Mel Gorman
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 07:21:58PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: * Mel Gorman mgor...@suse.de wrote: On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 06:33:16PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: * Mel Gorman mgor...@suse.de wrote: On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 06:03:06PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: * Mel