Re: [PATCH 00/52] RFC: Unified NUMA balancing tree, v1

2012-12-03 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Rik van Riel wrote: > >Rik van Riel (1): > > sched, numa, mm: Add credits for NUMA placement > > Where did the TLB flush optimizations go? :) They are still very much there, unchanged for a long time and acked by everyone - I thought I'd spare a few electrons by not doing a 60+ patches

Re: [PATCH 00/52] RFC: Unified NUMA balancing tree, v1

2012-12-03 Thread Rik van Riel
On 12/02/2012 01:42 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote: Most of the outstanding objections against numa/core centered around Mel and Rik objecting to the PROT_NONE approach Peter implemented in numa/core. To settle that question objectively I've performed performance testing of those differences, by picking

Re: [PATCH 00/52] RFC: Unified NUMA balancing tree, v1

2012-12-03 Thread Rik van Riel
On 12/02/2012 01:42 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote: Most of the outstanding objections against numa/core centered around Mel and Rik objecting to the PROT_NONE approach Peter implemented in numa/core. To settle that question objectively I've performed performance testing of those differences, by picking

Re: [PATCH 00/52] RFC: Unified NUMA balancing tree, v1

2012-12-03 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Rik van Riel r...@redhat.com wrote: Rik van Riel (1): sched, numa, mm: Add credits for NUMA placement Where did the TLB flush optimizations go? :) They are still very much there, unchanged for a long time and acked by everyone - I thought I'd spare a few electrons by not doing a 60+

Re: [PATCH 00/52] RFC: Unified NUMA balancing tree, v1

2012-12-02 Thread Ingo Molnar
The unified NUMA Git tree can be found in the -tip numa/base branch: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git numa/base The PROT_NONE -v18 numa/core tree can be found in tip:master: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git master Thanks, Ingo --

[PATCH 00/52] RFC: Unified NUMA balancing tree, v1

2012-12-02 Thread Ingo Molnar
Now that the code in numa/core is settling down nicely, I thought I'd address a growing testing/contribution problem that has become a problem over the last two weeks: the 'balacenuma' tree by Mel Gorman was drifting away from numa/core (or, numa/core was drifting away from Mel's tree, depending

[PATCH 00/52] RFC: Unified NUMA balancing tree, v1

2012-12-02 Thread Ingo Molnar
Now that the code in numa/core is settling down nicely, I thought I'd address a growing testing/contribution problem that has become a problem over the last two weeks: the 'balacenuma' tree by Mel Gorman was drifting away from numa/core (or, numa/core was drifting away from Mel's tree, depending

Re: [PATCH 00/52] RFC: Unified NUMA balancing tree, v1

2012-12-02 Thread Ingo Molnar
The unified NUMA Git tree can be found in the -tip numa/base branch: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git numa/base The PROT_NONE -v18 numa/core tree can be found in tip:master: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git master Thanks, Ingo --