On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 1:36 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 2:30 PM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>
> Sorry I missed that; I had only looked at a few patches adjacent to
> the one that split out this code.
>
> I still would like the code to be all in pci_root.c.
ok, I will rebase that to
On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 2:30 PM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 11:32 AM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 11:25 PM, Myron Stowe wrote:
>>> From: Yinghai Lu
>>>
>>>
>> For example, as soon as you put this code in pci_root.c instead of
>> pci_root_hp.c, it becomes
On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 11:32 AM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 11:25 PM, Myron Stowe wrote:
>> From: Yinghai Lu
>>
>>
> For example, as soon as you put this code in pci_root.c instead of
> pci_root_hp.c, it becomes obvious that we're keeping a list of host
> bridges in both
On Friday, December 07, 2012 12:32:46 PM Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 11:25 PM, Myron Stowe wrote:
> > From: Yinghai Lu
> >
> > It causes confusion.
>
> I completely agree that acpiphp causes confusion :)
>
> > We may only need acpi hp for pci host bridge.
> >
> > Split host
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 11:25 PM, Myron Stowe wrote:
> From: Yinghai Lu
>
> It causes confusion.
I completely agree that acpiphp causes confusion :)
> We may only need acpi hp for pci host bridge.
>
> Split host bridge hot-add support to pci_root_hp, and keep acpiphp simple.
>
> -v2: put back
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 11:25 PM, Myron Stowe myron.st...@redhat.com wrote:
From: Yinghai Lu ying...@kernel.org
It causes confusion.
I completely agree that acpiphp causes confusion :)
We may only need acpi hp for pci host bridge.
Split host bridge hot-add support to pci_root_hp, and keep
On Friday, December 07, 2012 12:32:46 PM Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 11:25 PM, Myron Stowe myron.st...@redhat.com wrote:
From: Yinghai Lu ying...@kernel.org
It causes confusion.
I completely agree that acpiphp causes confusion :)
We may only need acpi hp for pci host
On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 11:32 AM, Bjorn Helgaas bhelg...@google.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 11:25 PM, Myron Stowe myron.st...@redhat.com wrote:
From: Yinghai Lu ying...@kernel.org
For example, as soon as you put this code in pci_root.c instead of
pci_root_hp.c, it becomes obvious that
On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 2:30 PM, Yinghai Lu ying...@kernel.org wrote:
On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 11:32 AM, Bjorn Helgaas bhelg...@google.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 11:25 PM, Myron Stowe myron.st...@redhat.com wrote:
From: Yinghai Lu ying...@kernel.org
For example, as soon as you put this
On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 1:36 PM, Bjorn Helgaas bhelg...@google.com wrote:
On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 2:30 PM, Yinghai Lu ying...@kernel.org wrote:
Sorry I missed that; I had only looked at a few patches adjacent to
the one that split out this code.
I still would like the code to be all in
From: Yinghai Lu
It causes confusion.
We may only need acpi hp for pci host bridge.
Split host bridge hot-add support to pci_root_hp, and keep acpiphp simple.
-v2: put back pci_root_hp change in one patch
-v3: add pcibios_resource_survey_bus() calling
-v4: remove not needed code with
From: Yinghai Lu ying...@kernel.org
It causes confusion.
We may only need acpi hp for pci host bridge.
Split host bridge hot-add support to pci_root_hp, and keep acpiphp simple.
-v2: put back pci_root_hp change in one patch
-v3: add pcibios_resource_survey_bus() calling
-v4: remove not needed
12 matches
Mail list logo
