Re: [PATCH 05/11] inode: rename i_wb_list to i_io_list

2013-07-31 Thread Jan Kara
On Wed 31-07-13 14:15:44, Dave Chinner wrote: > From: Dave Chinner > > There's a small consistency problem between the inode and writeback > naming. Writeback calls the "for IO" inode queues b_io and > b_more_io, but the inode calls these the "writeback list" or > i_wb_list. This makes it hard

Re: [PATCH 05/11] inode: rename i_wb_list to i_io_list

2013-07-31 Thread Jan Kara
On Wed 31-07-13 14:15:44, Dave Chinner wrote: From: Dave Chinner dchin...@redhat.com There's a small consistency problem between the inode and writeback naming. Writeback calls the for IO inode queues b_io and b_more_io, but the inode calls these the writeback list or i_wb_list. This makes

[PATCH 05/11] inode: rename i_wb_list to i_io_list

2013-07-30 Thread Dave Chinner
From: Dave Chinner There's a small consistency problem between the inode and writeback naming. Writeback calls the "for IO" inode queues b_io and b_more_io, but the inode calls these the "writeback list" or i_wb_list. This makes it hard to an new "under writeback" list to the inode, or call it

[PATCH 05/11] inode: rename i_wb_list to i_io_list

2013-07-30 Thread Dave Chinner
From: Dave Chinner dchin...@redhat.com There's a small consistency problem between the inode and writeback naming. Writeback calls the for IO inode queues b_io and b_more_io, but the inode calls these the writeback list or i_wb_list. This makes it hard to an new under writeback list to the inode,