Re: [PATCH 05/17] mmc: mmci: Put the device into low power state at system suspend

2014-02-10 Thread Kevin Hilman
Ulf Hansson writes: > On 4 February 2014 20:22, Kevin Hilman wrote: >> Ulf Hansson writes: >> >>> Due to the available runtime PM callbacks, we are now able to put our >>> device into low power state at system suspend. >>> >>> Earlier we could not accomplish this without trusting a power

Re: [PATCH 05/17] mmc: mmci: Put the device into low power state at system suspend

2014-02-10 Thread Ulf Hansson
On 4 February 2014 20:22, Kevin Hilman wrote: > Ulf Hansson writes: > >> Due to the available runtime PM callbacks, we are now able to put our >> device into low power state at system suspend. >> >> Earlier we could not accomplish this without trusting a power domain >> for the device to take

Re: [PATCH 05/17] mmc: mmci: Put the device into low power state at system suspend

2014-02-10 Thread Ulf Hansson
On 4 February 2014 20:22, Kevin Hilman khil...@linaro.org wrote: Ulf Hansson ulf.hans...@linaro.org writes: Due to the available runtime PM callbacks, we are now able to put our device into low power state at system suspend. Earlier we could not accomplish this without trusting a power

Re: [PATCH 05/17] mmc: mmci: Put the device into low power state at system suspend

2014-02-10 Thread Kevin Hilman
Ulf Hansson ulf.hans...@linaro.org writes: On 4 February 2014 20:22, Kevin Hilman khil...@linaro.org wrote: Ulf Hansson ulf.hans...@linaro.org writes: Due to the available runtime PM callbacks, we are now able to put our device into low power state at system suspend. Earlier we could not

Re: [PATCH 05/17] mmc: mmci: Put the device into low power state at system suspend

2014-02-05 Thread Kevin Hilman
Linus Walleij writes: > On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 8:22 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote: >> Ulf Hansson writes: >> >>> Due to the available runtime PM callbacks, we are now able to put our >>> device into low power state at system suspend. > (...) >> I'm trying to thing of a good reason to not make

Re: [PATCH 05/17] mmc: mmci: Put the device into low power state at system suspend

2014-02-05 Thread Mark Brown
On Wed, Feb 05, 2014 at 01:49:49PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 8:22 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote: > > I'm trying to thing of a good reason to not make PM_SLEEP depend on > > PM_RUNTIME for platforms like this. > Isn't the typical Android platform using PM_SLEEP without using

Re: [PATCH 05/17] mmc: mmci: Put the device into low power state at system suspend

2014-02-05 Thread Linus Walleij
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 8:22 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote: > Ulf Hansson writes: > >> Due to the available runtime PM callbacks, we are now able to put our >> device into low power state at system suspend. (...) > I'm trying to thing of a good reason to not make PM_SLEEP depend on > PM_RUNTIME for

Re: [PATCH 05/17] mmc: mmci: Put the device into low power state at system suspend

2014-02-05 Thread Linus Walleij
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 8:22 PM, Kevin Hilman khil...@linaro.org wrote: Ulf Hansson ulf.hans...@linaro.org writes: Due to the available runtime PM callbacks, we are now able to put our device into low power state at system suspend. (...) I'm trying to thing of a good reason to not make

Re: [PATCH 05/17] mmc: mmci: Put the device into low power state at system suspend

2014-02-05 Thread Mark Brown
On Wed, Feb 05, 2014 at 01:49:49PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote: On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 8:22 PM, Kevin Hilman khil...@linaro.org wrote: I'm trying to thing of a good reason to not make PM_SLEEP depend on PM_RUNTIME for platforms like this. Isn't the typical Android platform using PM_SLEEP

Re: [PATCH 05/17] mmc: mmci: Put the device into low power state at system suspend

2014-02-05 Thread Kevin Hilman
Linus Walleij linus.wall...@linaro.org writes: On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 8:22 PM, Kevin Hilman khil...@linaro.org wrote: Ulf Hansson ulf.hans...@linaro.org writes: Due to the available runtime PM callbacks, we are now able to put our device into low power state at system suspend. (...) I'm

Re: [PATCH 05/17] mmc: mmci: Put the device into low power state at system suspend

2014-02-04 Thread Kevin Hilman
Ulf Hansson writes: > Due to the available runtime PM callbacks, we are now able to put our > device into low power state at system suspend. > > Earlier we could not accomplish this without trusting a power domain > for the device to take care of it. Now we are able to cope with > scenarios both

[PATCH 05/17] mmc: mmci: Put the device into low power state at system suspend

2014-02-04 Thread Ulf Hansson
Due to the available runtime PM callbacks, we are now able to put our device into low power state at system suspend. Earlier we could not accomplish this without trusting a power domain for the device to take care of it. Now we are able to cope with scenarios both with and without a power domain.

[PATCH 05/17] mmc: mmci: Put the device into low power state at system suspend

2014-02-04 Thread Ulf Hansson
Due to the available runtime PM callbacks, we are now able to put our device into low power state at system suspend. Earlier we could not accomplish this without trusting a power domain for the device to take care of it. Now we are able to cope with scenarios both with and without a power domain.

Re: [PATCH 05/17] mmc: mmci: Put the device into low power state at system suspend

2014-02-04 Thread Kevin Hilman
Ulf Hansson ulf.hans...@linaro.org writes: Due to the available runtime PM callbacks, we are now able to put our device into low power state at system suspend. Earlier we could not accomplish this without trusting a power domain for the device to take care of it. Now we are able to cope with