On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 11:19:58PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> Joonsoo Kim writes:
>
> > vma_need_reservation() can be substituted by vma_has_reserves()
> > with minor change. These function do almost same thing,
> > so unifying them is better to maintain.
>
> I found the resulting code
Hello, Naoya.
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 01:52:52PM -0400, Naoya Horiguchi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 02:31:57PM +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> > vma_need_reservation() can be substituted by vma_has_reserves()
> > with minor change. These function do almost same thing,
> > so unifying
Joonsoo Kim writes:
> vma_need_reservation() can be substituted by vma_has_reserves()
> with minor change. These function do almost same thing,
> so unifying them is better to maintain.
I found the resulting code confusing and complex. I am sure there is
more that what is explained in the
Joonsoo Kim iamjoonsoo@lge.com writes:
vma_need_reservation() can be substituted by vma_has_reserves()
with minor change. These function do almost same thing,
so unifying them is better to maintain.
I found the resulting code confusing and complex. I am sure there is
more that what is
Hello, Naoya.
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 01:52:52PM -0400, Naoya Horiguchi wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 02:31:57PM +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
vma_need_reservation() can be substituted by vma_has_reserves()
with minor change. These function do almost same thing,
so unifying them is
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 11:19:58PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
Joonsoo Kim iamjoonsoo@lge.com writes:
vma_need_reservation() can be substituted by vma_has_reserves()
with minor change. These function do almost same thing,
so unifying them is better to maintain.
I found the
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 02:31:57PM +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> vma_need_reservation() can be substituted by vma_has_reserves()
> with minor change. These function do almost same thing,
> so unifying them is better to maintain.
I think it could, but not with minor changes.
vma_has_reserves
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 02:31:57PM +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
vma_need_reservation() can be substituted by vma_has_reserves()
with minor change. These function do almost same thing,
so unifying them is better to maintain.
I think it could, but not with minor changes.
vma_has_reserves is
vma_need_reservation() can be substituted by vma_has_reserves()
with minor change. These function do almost same thing,
so unifying them is better to maintain.
Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim
diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
index bf2ee11..ff46a2c 100644
--- a/mm/hugetlb.c
+++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
vma_need_reservation() can be substituted by vma_has_reserves()
with minor change. These function do almost same thing,
so unifying them is better to maintain.
Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim iamjoonsoo@lge.com
diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
index bf2ee11..ff46a2c 100644
---
10 matches
Mail list logo