On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 12:11 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
> For the moment at least, the TX and RX channels for DB8500 USB are
> identical, so this patch generalises them into a single structure
> and passes it twice. Once as the TX and again for the RX configuration.
> We're keeping the infrastructure
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 12:11 PM, Lee Jones lee.jo...@linaro.org wrote:
For the moment at least, the TX and RX channels for DB8500 USB are
identical, so this patch generalises them into a single structure
and passes it twice. Once as the TX and again for the RX configuration.
We're keeping
On Thursday 18 April 2013, Lee Jones wrote:
> For the moment at least, the TX and RX channels for DB8500 USB are
> identical, so this patch generalises them into a single structure
> and passes it twice. Once as the TX and again for the RX configuration.
> We're keeping the infrastructure the same
For the moment at least, the TX and RX channels for DB8500 USB are
identical, so this patch generalises them into a single structure
and passes it twice. Once as the TX and again for the RX configuration.
We're keeping the infrastructure the same i.e. passing the TX and RX
separately in case they
For the moment at least, the TX and RX channels for DB8500 USB are
identical, so this patch generalises them into a single structure
and passes it twice. Once as the TX and again for the RX configuration.
We're keeping the infrastructure the same i.e. passing the TX and RX
separately in case they
On Thursday 18 April 2013, Lee Jones wrote:
For the moment at least, the TX and RX channels for DB8500 USB are
identical, so this patch generalises them into a single structure
and passes it twice. Once as the TX and again for the RX configuration.
We're keeping the infrastructure the same
6 matches
Mail list logo
