Hi Alexandre,
> -Original Message-
> From: Alexandre Belloni [mailto:alexandre.bell...@free-electrons.com]
> Sent: Saturday, January 24, 2015 7:13 AM
> To: Sylvain Rochet
> Cc: Yang, Wenyou; Ferre, Nicolas; li...@arm.linux.org.uk; linux-
> ker...@vger.kernel.org; p...@axentia.se;
Hi Alexandre,
-Original Message-
From: Alexandre Belloni [mailto:alexandre.bell...@free-electrons.com]
Sent: Saturday, January 24, 2015 7:13 AM
To: Sylvain Rochet
Cc: Yang, Wenyou; Ferre, Nicolas; li...@arm.linux.org.uk; linux-
ker...@vger.kernel.org; p...@axentia.se;
Hi Alexandre,
Thank you for review.
> -Original Message-
> From: Alexandre Belloni [mailto:alexandre.bell...@free-electrons.com]
> Sent: Saturday, January 24, 2015 7:02 AM
> To: Sylvain Rochet
> Cc: Yang, Wenyou; Ferre, Nicolas; li...@arm.linux.org.uk; linux-
> ker...@vger.kernel.org;
Hi Sylvain,
Thank you for review.
> -Original Message-
> From: Sylvain Rochet [mailto:sylvain.roc...@finsecur.com]
> Sent: Saturday, January 24, 2015 1:33 AM
> To: Yang, Wenyou
> Cc: Ferre, Nicolas; li...@arm.linux.org.uk; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
>
Hi Alexandre,
Thank you for review.
-Original Message-
From: Alexandre Belloni [mailto:alexandre.bell...@free-electrons.com]
Sent: Saturday, January 24, 2015 7:02 AM
To: Sylvain Rochet
Cc: Yang, Wenyou; Ferre, Nicolas; li...@arm.linux.org.uk; linux-
ker...@vger.kernel.org;
Hi Sylvain,
Thank you for review.
-Original Message-
From: Sylvain Rochet [mailto:sylvain.roc...@finsecur.com]
Sent: Saturday, January 24, 2015 1:33 AM
To: Yang, Wenyou
Cc: Ferre, Nicolas; li...@arm.linux.org.uk; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
alexandre.bell...@free-electrons.com;
On 23/01/2015 at 17:50:20 +0100, Sylvain Rochet wrote :
> Hello Wenyou,
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 04:17:00PM +0800, Wenyou Yang wrote:
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c b/arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c
> > index 691e6db..a1010f0 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c
> > +++
On 23/01/2015 at 18:32:34 +0100, Sylvain Rochet wrote :
> Hello Wenyou,
>
> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 04:17:00PM +0800, Wenyou Yang wrote:
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c b/arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c
> > index 691e6db..a1010f0 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c
> > +++
Hello Wenyou,
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 04:17:00PM +0800, Wenyou Yang wrote:
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c b/arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c
> index 691e6db..a1010f0 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c
(...)
> static int at91_pm_enter(suspend_state_t state)
Hello Wenyou,
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 04:17:00PM +0800, Wenyou Yang wrote:
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c b/arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c
> index 691e6db..a1010f0 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c
> @@ -145,62 +145,51 @@ extern void
On 20/01/2015 at 16:17:00 +0800, Wenyou Yang wrote :
> To simply the PM code, the suspend to standby mode uses the same sram function
> as the suspend to memory mode, running in the internal SRAM,
> instead of the respective code for each mode.
>
> But for the suspend to standby mode, the master
Hello Wenyou,
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 04:17:00PM +0800, Wenyou Yang wrote:
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c b/arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c
index 691e6db..a1010f0 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c
(...)
static int at91_pm_enter(suspend_state_t state)
{
Hello Wenyou,
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 04:17:00PM +0800, Wenyou Yang wrote:
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c b/arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c
index 691e6db..a1010f0 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c
@@ -145,62 +145,51 @@ extern void at91_slow_clock(void
On 23/01/2015 at 17:50:20 +0100, Sylvain Rochet wrote :
Hello Wenyou,
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 04:17:00PM +0800, Wenyou Yang wrote:
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c b/arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c
index 691e6db..a1010f0 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c
+++
On 23/01/2015 at 18:32:34 +0100, Sylvain Rochet wrote :
Hello Wenyou,
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 04:17:00PM +0800, Wenyou Yang wrote:
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c b/arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c
index 691e6db..a1010f0 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c
On 20/01/2015 at 16:17:00 +0800, Wenyou Yang wrote :
To simply the PM code, the suspend to standby mode uses the same sram function
as the suspend to memory mode, running in the internal SRAM,
instead of the respective code for each mode.
But for the suspend to standby mode, the master clock
To simply the PM code, the suspend to standby mode uses the same sram function
as the suspend to memory mode, running in the internal SRAM,
instead of the respective code for each mode.
But for the suspend to standby mode, the master clock doesn't
switch to the slow clock, and the main
To simply the PM code, the suspend to standby mode uses the same sram function
as the suspend to memory mode, running in the internal SRAM,
instead of the respective code for each mode.
But for the suspend to standby mode, the master clock doesn't
switch to the slow clock, and the main
18 matches
Mail list logo