Jens wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 20 2008, Mike Miller wrote:
> > Patch 1 of 1
> >
> > This patch hopefully fixes all the brokeness in my last
> submission. It
> > compiles cleanly with tape support on or off. I added a couple of
> > #ifdef's and removed the broken macro definition. The
> #ifdef's made
Jens wrote:
On Wed, Feb 20 2008, Mike Miller wrote:
Patch 1 of 1
This patch hopefully fixes all the brokeness in my last
submission. It
compiles cleanly with tape support on or off. I added a couple of
#ifdef's and removed the broken macro definition. The
#ifdef's made it
On Wed, Feb 20 2008, Mike Miller wrote:
> Patch 1 of 1
>
> This patch hopefully fixes all the brokeness in my last submission. It
> compiles cleanly with tape support on or off. I added a couple of #ifdef's
> and removed the broken macro definition. The #ifdef's made it unneccesary.
> It also
Patch 1 of 1
This patch hopefully fixes all the brokeness in my last submission. It
compiles cleanly with tape support on or off. I added a couple of #ifdef's
and removed the broken macro definition. The #ifdef's made it unneccesary.
It also replaces create_proc_read_entry with proc_create.
This
Patch 1 of 1
This patch hopefully fixes all the brokeness in my last submission. It
compiles cleanly with tape support on or off. I added a couple of #ifdef's
and removed the broken macro definition. The #ifdef's made it unneccesary.
It also replaces create_proc_read_entry with proc_create.
This
On Wed, Feb 20 2008, Mike Miller wrote:
Patch 1 of 1
This patch hopefully fixes all the brokeness in my last submission. It
compiles cleanly with tape support on or off. I added a couple of #ifdef's
and removed the broken macro definition. The #ifdef's made it unneccesary.
It also replaces
6 matches
Mail list logo