On Wed, Dec 2, 2020 at 6:45 PM Ira Weiny wrote:
> >
> > What would the typical failure cases be in practice?
>
> The failure will be a user not seeing their file operating in DAX mode when
> they expect it to.
>
> I discussed this with Dan Williams today. He and I agreed the flag is new
> enough
On Wed, Dec 02, 2020 at 12:42:08PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 1, 2020 at 6:16 PM Ira Weiny wrote:
> >
> > This will force a change to xfstests at a minimum. And I do know of users
> > who
> > have been using this value. But I have gotten inquires about using the
> > feature
>
On Tue, Dec 1, 2020 at 6:16 PM Ira Weiny wrote:
>
> This will force a change to xfstests at a minimum. And I do know of users who
> have been using this value. But I have gotten inquires about using the
> feature
> so there are users out there.
If it's only a few tests that fail, I wouldn't
On Tue, Dec 01, 2020 at 10:57:11AM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> STATX_ATTR_MOUNT_ROOT and STATX_ATTR_DAX got merged with the same value,
> so one of them needs fixing. Move STATX_ATTR_DAX.
>
> While we're in here, clarify the value-matching scheme for some of the
> attributes, and explain why the
On 12/1/20 12:31 PM, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> On Dec 1, 2020, at 10:44 AM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>>
>> On 12/1/20 11:32 AM, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
>>> On Tue, Dec 01, 2020 at 10:57:11AM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote:
STATX_ATTR_MOUNT_ROOT and STATX_ATTR_DAX got merged with the same value,
so
On Dec 1, 2020, at 10:44 AM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>
> On 12/1/20 11:32 AM, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 01, 2020 at 10:57:11AM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>>> STATX_ATTR_MOUNT_ROOT and STATX_ATTR_DAX got merged with the same value,
>>> so one of them needs fixing. Move STATX_ATTR_DAX.
>>>
On 12/1/20 11:32 AM, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 01, 2020 at 10:57:11AM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>> STATX_ATTR_MOUNT_ROOT and STATX_ATTR_DAX got merged with the same value,
>> so one of them needs fixing. Move STATX_ATTR_DAX.
>>
>> While we're in here, clarify the value-matching scheme
On Tue, Dec 01, 2020 at 10:57:11AM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> STATX_ATTR_MOUNT_ROOT and STATX_ATTR_DAX got merged with the same value,
> so one of them needs fixing. Move STATX_ATTR_DAX.
>
> While we're in here, clarify the value-matching scheme for some of the
> attributes, and explain why the
Eric Sandeen wrote:
> STATX_ATTR_MOUNT_ROOT and STATX_ATTR_DAX got merged with the same value,
> so one of them needs fixing. Move STATX_ATTR_DAX.
>
> While we're in here, clarify the value-matching scheme for some of the
> attributes, and explain why the value for DAX does not match.
>
>
STATX_ATTR_MOUNT_ROOT and STATX_ATTR_DAX got merged with the same value,
so one of them needs fixing. Move STATX_ATTR_DAX.
While we're in here, clarify the value-matching scheme for some of the
attributes, and explain why the value for DAX does not match.
Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen
---
10 matches
Mail list logo