On 10/10/2018 03:09 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Wed 10-10-18 08:39:22, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> [...]
>> diff --git a/include/linux/hugetlb.h b/include/linux/hugetlb.h
>> index 9df1d59..4bcbf1e 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/hugetlb.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/hugetlb.h
>> @@ -504,6 +504,16 @@
On 10/10/2018 03:09 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Wed 10-10-18 08:39:22, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> [...]
>> diff --git a/include/linux/hugetlb.h b/include/linux/hugetlb.h
>> index 9df1d59..4bcbf1e 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/hugetlb.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/hugetlb.h
>> @@ -504,6 +504,16 @@
On Wed 10-10-18 08:39:22, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
[...]
> diff --git a/include/linux/hugetlb.h b/include/linux/hugetlb.h
> index 9df1d59..4bcbf1e 100644
> --- a/include/linux/hugetlb.h
> +++ b/include/linux/hugetlb.h
> @@ -504,6 +504,16 @@ static inline bool hugepage_migration_supported(struct
>
On Wed 10-10-18 08:39:22, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
[...]
> diff --git a/include/linux/hugetlb.h b/include/linux/hugetlb.h
> index 9df1d59..4bcbf1e 100644
> --- a/include/linux/hugetlb.h
> +++ b/include/linux/hugetlb.h
> @@ -504,6 +504,16 @@ static inline bool hugepage_migration_supported(struct
>
On 10/09/2018 07:44 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Fri 05-10-18 13:04:43, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>> Does the following sound close enough to what you are looking for ?
>
> I do not think so
Okay.
>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/hugetlb.h b/include/linux/hugetlb.h
>> index 9df1d59..070c419
On 10/09/2018 07:44 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Fri 05-10-18 13:04:43, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>> Does the following sound close enough to what you are looking for ?
>
> I do not think so
Okay.
>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/hugetlb.h b/include/linux/hugetlb.h
>> index 9df1d59..070c419
On Fri 05-10-18 13:04:43, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> Does the following sound close enough to what you are looking for ?
I do not think so
> diff --git a/include/linux/hugetlb.h b/include/linux/hugetlb.h
> index 9df1d59..070c419 100644
> --- a/include/linux/hugetlb.h
> +++
On Fri 05-10-18 13:04:43, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> Does the following sound close enough to what you are looking for ?
I do not think so
> diff --git a/include/linux/hugetlb.h b/include/linux/hugetlb.h
> index 9df1d59..070c419 100644
> --- a/include/linux/hugetlb.h
> +++
On 10/03/2018 07:06 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Wed 03-10-18 18:36:39, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> [...]
>> So we have two checks here
>>
>> 1) platform specific arch_hugetlb_migration -> In principle go ahead
>>
>> 2) huge_movable() during allocation
>>
>> - If huge page does not have to
On 10/03/2018 07:06 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Wed 03-10-18 18:36:39, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> [...]
>> So we have two checks here
>>
>> 1) platform specific arch_hugetlb_migration -> In principle go ahead
>>
>> 2) huge_movable() during allocation
>>
>> - If huge page does not have to
On Wed 03-10-18 18:36:39, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
[...]
> So we have two checks here
>
> 1) platform specific arch_hugetlb_migration -> In principle go ahead
>
> 2) huge_movable() during allocation
>
> - If huge page does not have to be placed on movable zone
>
> -
On Wed 03-10-18 18:36:39, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
[...]
> So we have two checks here
>
> 1) platform specific arch_hugetlb_migration -> In principle go ahead
>
> 2) huge_movable() during allocation
>
> - If huge page does not have to be placed on movable zone
>
> -
On 10/03/2018 05:18 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Wed 03-10-18 17:07:13, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 10/03/2018 04:29 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> [...]
>>> It is not the platform that decides. That is the whole point of the
>>> distinction. It is us to say what is feasible and what we
On 10/03/2018 05:18 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Wed 03-10-18 17:07:13, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 10/03/2018 04:29 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> [...]
>>> It is not the platform that decides. That is the whole point of the
>>> distinction. It is us to say what is feasible and what we
On Wed 03-10-18 17:07:13, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>
>
> On 10/03/2018 04:29 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
[...]
> > It is not the platform that decides. That is the whole point of the
> > distinction. It is us to say what is feasible and what we want to
> > support. Do we want to support giga pages
On Wed 03-10-18 17:07:13, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>
>
> On 10/03/2018 04:29 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
[...]
> > It is not the platform that decides. That is the whole point of the
> > distinction. It is us to say what is feasible and what we want to
> > support. Do we want to support giga pages
On 10/03/2018 04:29 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Wed 03-10-18 15:28:23, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 10/03/2018 12:28 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
>>> On Wed 03-10-18 07:46:27, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
On 10/02/2018 06:09 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Tue 02-10-18 17:45:28,
On 10/03/2018 04:29 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Wed 03-10-18 15:28:23, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 10/03/2018 12:28 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
>>> On Wed 03-10-18 07:46:27, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
On 10/02/2018 06:09 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Tue 02-10-18 17:45:28,
On Wed 03-10-18 12:17:52, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
[...]
> I have been under the idea that all the checks at the same level could
> have the same indentation. (i.e, 2 tabs in this case for each). Looks
> like there is no rule about it. How about replacing it with a
> switch..case ?
I would simply
On Wed 03-10-18 12:17:52, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
[...]
> I have been under the idea that all the checks at the same level could
> have the same indentation. (i.e, 2 tabs in this case for each). Looks
> like there is no rule about it. How about replacing it with a
> switch..case ?
I would simply
On 03/10/18 12:10, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
On 10/03/2018 03:52 PM, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
On 02/10/18 13:56, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
On 10/02/2018 06:08 PM, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
Hi Anshuman
On 02/10/18 13:15, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
Architectures like arm64 have PUD level
On 03/10/18 12:10, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
On 10/03/2018 03:52 PM, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
On 02/10/18 13:56, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
On 10/02/2018 06:08 PM, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
Hi Anshuman
On 02/10/18 13:15, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
Architectures like arm64 have PUD level
On 10/03/2018 03:52 PM, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
>
>
> On 02/10/18 13:56, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 10/02/2018 06:08 PM, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
>>> Hi Anshuman
>>>
>>> On 02/10/18 13:15, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
Architectures like arm64 have PUD level HugeTLB pages for certain
On 10/03/2018 03:52 PM, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
>
>
> On 02/10/18 13:56, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 10/02/2018 06:08 PM, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
>>> Hi Anshuman
>>>
>>> On 02/10/18 13:15, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
Architectures like arm64 have PUD level HugeTLB pages for certain
On Wed 03-10-18 15:28:23, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>
>
> On 10/03/2018 12:28 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Wed 03-10-18 07:46:27, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On 10/02/2018 06:09 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> >>> On Tue 02-10-18 17:45:28, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> Architectures
On Wed 03-10-18 15:28:23, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>
>
> On 10/03/2018 12:28 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Wed 03-10-18 07:46:27, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On 10/02/2018 06:09 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> >>> On Tue 02-10-18 17:45:28, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> Architectures
On 02/10/18 13:56, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
On 10/02/2018 06:08 PM, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
Hi Anshuman
On 02/10/18 13:15, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
Architectures like arm64 have PUD level HugeTLB pages for certain configs
(1GB huge page is PUD based on ARM64_4K_PAGES base page size) that
On 02/10/18 13:56, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
On 10/02/2018 06:08 PM, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
Hi Anshuman
On 02/10/18 13:15, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
Architectures like arm64 have PUD level HugeTLB pages for certain configs
(1GB huge page is PUD based on ARM64_4K_PAGES base page size) that
On 10/03/2018 12:28 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Wed 03-10-18 07:46:27, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 10/02/2018 06:09 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
>>> On Tue 02-10-18 17:45:28, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
Architectures like arm64 have PUD level HugeTLB pages for certain configs
(1GB
On 10/03/2018 12:28 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Wed 03-10-18 07:46:27, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 10/02/2018 06:09 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
>>> On Tue 02-10-18 17:45:28, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
Architectures like arm64 have PUD level HugeTLB pages for certain configs
(1GB
On Wed 03-10-18 07:46:27, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>
>
> On 10/02/2018 06:09 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Tue 02-10-18 17:45:28, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> >> Architectures like arm64 have PUD level HugeTLB pages for certain configs
> >> (1GB huge page is PUD based on ARM64_4K_PAGES base page
On Wed 03-10-18 07:46:27, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>
>
> On 10/02/2018 06:09 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Tue 02-10-18 17:45:28, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> >> Architectures like arm64 have PUD level HugeTLB pages for certain configs
> >> (1GB huge page is PUD based on ARM64_4K_PAGES base page
On 10/02/2018 06:09 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Tue 02-10-18 17:45:28, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>> Architectures like arm64 have PUD level HugeTLB pages for certain configs
>> (1GB huge page is PUD based on ARM64_4K_PAGES base page size) that can be
>> enabled for migration. It can be achieved
On 10/02/2018 06:09 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Tue 02-10-18 17:45:28, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>> Architectures like arm64 have PUD level HugeTLB pages for certain configs
>> (1GB huge page is PUD based on ARM64_4K_PAGES base page size) that can be
>> enabled for migration. It can be achieved
On 10/02/2018 06:08 PM, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
> Hi Anshuman
>
> On 02/10/18 13:15, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>> Architectures like arm64 have PUD level HugeTLB pages for certain configs
>> (1GB huge page is PUD based on ARM64_4K_PAGES base page size) that can be
>> enabled for migration. It
On 10/02/2018 06:08 PM, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
> Hi Anshuman
>
> On 02/10/18 13:15, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>> Architectures like arm64 have PUD level HugeTLB pages for certain configs
>> (1GB huge page is PUD based on ARM64_4K_PAGES base page size) that can be
>> enabled for migration. It
On Tue 02-10-18 17:45:28, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> Architectures like arm64 have PUD level HugeTLB pages for certain configs
> (1GB huge page is PUD based on ARM64_4K_PAGES base page size) that can be
> enabled for migration. It can be achieved through checking for PUD_SHIFT
> order based
On Tue 02-10-18 17:45:28, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> Architectures like arm64 have PUD level HugeTLB pages for certain configs
> (1GB huge page is PUD based on ARM64_4K_PAGES base page size) that can be
> enabled for migration. It can be achieved through checking for PUD_SHIFT
> order based
Hi Anshuman
On 02/10/18 13:15, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
Architectures like arm64 have PUD level HugeTLB pages for certain configs
(1GB huge page is PUD based on ARM64_4K_PAGES base page size) that can be
enabled for migration. It can be achieved through checking for PUD_SHIFT
order based
Hi Anshuman
On 02/10/18 13:15, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
Architectures like arm64 have PUD level HugeTLB pages for certain configs
(1GB huge page is PUD based on ARM64_4K_PAGES base page size) that can be
enabled for migration. It can be achieved through checking for PUD_SHIFT
order based
Architectures like arm64 have PUD level HugeTLB pages for certain configs
(1GB huge page is PUD based on ARM64_4K_PAGES base page size) that can be
enabled for migration. It can be achieved through checking for PUD_SHIFT
order based HugeTLB pages during migration.
Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual
Architectures like arm64 have PUD level HugeTLB pages for certain configs
(1GB huge page is PUD based on ARM64_4K_PAGES base page size) that can be
enabled for migration. It can be achieved through checking for PUD_SHIFT
order based HugeTLB pages during migration.
Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual
42 matches
Mail list logo
