On 4/30/2019 4:56 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 07:44:02AM -0700, kan.li...@linux.intel.com wrote:
diff --git a/include/linux/perf_event.h b/include/linux/perf_event.h
index e47ef76..039e2f2 100644
--- a/include/linux/perf_event.h
+++ b/include/linux/perf_event.h
@@
On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 07:44:02AM -0700, kan.li...@linux.intel.com wrote:
> diff --git a/include/linux/perf_event.h b/include/linux/perf_event.h
> index e47ef76..039e2f2 100644
> --- a/include/linux/perf_event.h
> +++ b/include/linux/perf_event.h
> @@ -795,6 +795,7 @@ struct perf_cpu_context {
>
On 4/29/2019 11:04 AM, Mark Rutland wrote:
On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 07:44:02AM -0700, kan.li...@linux.intel.com wrote:
From: Kan Liang
When counting system-wide events and cgroup events simultaneously, the
value of system-wide events are miscounting. For example,
perf stat -e
On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 07:44:02AM -0700, kan.li...@linux.intel.com wrote:
> From: Kan Liang
>
> When counting system-wide events and cgroup events simultaneously, the
> value of system-wide events are miscounting. For example,
>
> perf stat -e cycles,instructions -e cycles,instructions -G
From: Kan Liang
When counting system-wide events and cgroup events simultaneously, the
value of system-wide events are miscounting. For example,
perf stat -e cycles,instructions -e cycles,instructions -G
cgroup1,cgroup1,cgroup2,cgroup2 -a -e cycles,instructions -I 1000
1.096265502
5 matches
Mail list logo