On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 04:47:58PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 30 January 2013 16:34, Fabio Baltieri wrote:
> > Small sidenote, actually what I'm going to drop here i *cdbs, as I need
> > cpu for schedule_delayed_work_on and can't use cdbs->cpu for that as
> > it's the master's one.
>
> I
On 30 January 2013 16:34, Fabio Baltieri wrote:
> Small sidenote, actually what I'm going to drop here i *cdbs, as I need
> cpu for schedule_delayed_work_on and can't use cdbs->cpu for that as
> it's the master's one.
I can't find code which would do j_cdbs->cpu = j and so j_cdbs->cpu is
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 10:14:53AM +0100, Fabio Baltieri wrote:
> Hello Viresh,
>
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 12:33:40PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > I am starting to follow cpufreq patches religiously now and so have to come
> > back to this old thread due to some crash we got :)
> >
> > Its
Hello Viresh,
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 12:33:40PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> I am starting to follow cpufreq patches religiously now and so have to come
> back to this old thread due to some crash we got :)
>
> Its still not pushed upstream, so better to get it resolved before 3.9.
Definitely,
Hello Viresh,
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 12:33:40PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
I am starting to follow cpufreq patches religiously now and so have to come
back to this old thread due to some crash we got :)
Its still not pushed upstream, so better to get it resolved before 3.9.
Definitely,
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 10:14:53AM +0100, Fabio Baltieri wrote:
Hello Viresh,
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 12:33:40PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
I am starting to follow cpufreq patches religiously now and so have to come
back to this old thread due to some crash we got :)
Its still not
On 30 January 2013 16:34, Fabio Baltieri fabio.balti...@linaro.org wrote:
Small sidenote, actually what I'm going to drop here i *cdbs, as I need
cpu for schedule_delayed_work_on and can't use cdbs-cpu for that as
it's the master's one.
I can't find code which would do j_cdbs-cpu = j and so
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 04:47:58PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
On 30 January 2013 16:34, Fabio Baltieri fabio.balti...@linaro.org wrote:
Small sidenote, actually what I'm going to drop here i *cdbs, as I need
cpu for schedule_delayed_work_on and can't use cdbs-cpu for that as
it's the
I am starting to follow cpufreq patches religiously now and so have to come
back to this old thread due to some crash we got :)
Its still not pushed upstream, so better to get it resolved before 3.9.
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 8:25 PM, Fabio Baltieri
wrote:
> diff --git
I am starting to follow cpufreq patches religiously now and so have to come
back to this old thread due to some crash we got :)
Its still not pushed upstream, so better to get it resolved before 3.9.
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 8:25 PM, Fabio Baltieri
fabio.balti...@linaro.org wrote:
diff --git
From: Rickard Andersson
This patch fixes a bug that occurred when we had load on a secondary CPU
and the primary CPU was sleeping. Only one sampling timer was spawned
and it was spawned as a deferred timer on the primary CPU, so when a
secondary CPU had a change in load this was not detected by
From: Rickard Andersson rickard.anders...@stericsson.com
This patch fixes a bug that occurred when we had load on a secondary CPU
and the primary CPU was sleeping. Only one sampling timer was spawned
and it was spawned as a deferred timer on the primary CPU, so when a
secondary CPU had a change
On Wednesday, November 28, 2012 11:51:20 AM Fabio Baltieri wrote:
> Hello Rafael,
Hi,
> On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 11:05:52PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > static inline void dbs_timer_init(struct dbs_data *dbs_data,
> > > - struct cpu_dbs_common_info *cdbs, unsigned int
Hello Rafael,
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 11:05:52PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > static inline void dbs_timer_init(struct dbs_data *dbs_data,
> > - struct cpu_dbs_common_info *cdbs, unsigned int sampling_rate)
> > + struct cpu_dbs_common_info *cdbs,
> >
Hello Rafael,
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 11:05:52PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
static inline void dbs_timer_init(struct dbs_data *dbs_data,
- struct cpu_dbs_common_info *cdbs, unsigned int sampling_rate)
+ struct cpu_dbs_common_info *cdbs,
+
On Wednesday, November 28, 2012 11:51:20 AM Fabio Baltieri wrote:
Hello Rafael,
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 11:05:52PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
static inline void dbs_timer_init(struct dbs_data *dbs_data,
- struct cpu_dbs_common_info *cdbs, unsigned int sampling_rate)
On Monday, November 26, 2012 05:39:52 PM Fabio Baltieri wrote:
> From: Rickard Andersson
>
> This patch fixes a bug that occurred when we had load on a secondary CPU
> and the primary CPU was sleeping. Only one sampling timer was spawned
> and it was spawned as a deferred timer on the primary
On Monday, November 26, 2012 05:39:52 PM Fabio Baltieri wrote:
From: Rickard Andersson rickard.anders...@stericsson.com
This patch fixes a bug that occurred when we had load on a secondary CPU
and the primary CPU was sleeping. Only one sampling timer was spawned
and it was spawned as a
From: Rickard Andersson
This patch fixes a bug that occurred when we had load on a secondary CPU
and the primary CPU was sleeping. Only one sampling timer was spawned
and it was spawned as a deferred timer on the primary CPU, so when a
secondary CPU had a change in load this was not detected by
From: Rickard Andersson rickard.anders...@stericsson.com
This patch fixes a bug that occurred when we had load on a secondary CPU
and the primary CPU was sleeping. Only one sampling timer was spawned
and it was spawned as a deferred timer on the primary CPU, so when a
secondary CPU had a change
20 matches
Mail list logo
